Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times
This is an article describing the Transcendent, yet Personal God of the Abrahamic Faiths in the present day scientific paradigm, the One God of Islam, Unitarian Christianity and Judaism.
If my articles are boring to you, it may be that you need to read more of them, as was suggested by John Cage, “If something is boring after two minutes, try it for four. If still boring, then eight. Then sixteen. Then thirty-two. Eventually one discovers that it is not boring at all.”
In the three great monotheistic religions, Islam, Christianity and Judaism, God is viewed as a supreme, transcendent being, beyond matter space and time, and yet the foundation of all that meets our senses that is described in terms of matter, space, and time. That is the Al Batin or the Hidden God of monotheism. Furthermore, this God is not the god of deism, who created the world and then left it alone, or the god of pantheism, who is equated with all of existence. The Islamic and the Judeo-Christian God is a nanosecond-by-nanosecond participant in each event that takes place in every cubic nanometer of the universe. He has full knowledge of all things. God listens to every thought and participates in each action of his very special creation, a minute bit of organized matter called humanity that moves around on the surface of a tiny pebble in a vast universe. The Holy Quran declares:
Allah’s is the Kingdom of the heavens and the earth; and to Allah are all affairs returned for final judgment. (Al Quran 57:6)
Whereas the nineteenth century physics was about to frame God out of physical understanding of the universe, the twentieth century physics has turned the tables in favor of Monotheism.
To the atheists design in the universe is apparent but not real. For the theists, enlightened in science, the converse is true, the self sufficiency of the universe based on the laws of nature is apparent and perceived only and is not real. God is the Law Giver and sustainer of the universe. Both positions may be argued to some degree from modern science. However, only theism can offer a holistic approach, not only explaining our universe, but also human morality and ethics, our history and personal experience.
When we approach science from this theistic perspective we find that our religion and science become one and our psyche finds unification.
If there is a ‘Personal God’ that hears human prayers then there has to be a way for the deity to influence the physical world without breaking the laws of nature and making the study of science futile. Quantum physics may be the magical wand, whereby Personal God can influence our world, without breaking the laws of nature. In His infinite wisdom, the Omniscient God provided for infinite means to maintain His divinity!
The article, the Indispensible God Hypothesis can be read online in the fall, 2008 volume, on page 22 of the PDF file: Muslim Sunrise Fall 2008.
Albert Einstein, the man of the 20th century according to the Time magazine, once said, “All of science is nothing more than the refinement of everyday thinking.” (1)
So, if Islam be a true religion from All Knowing God, it should stand the test of science. In fact the same argument was advanced by St. Augustine of Hippo, in favor of Christianity, a few centuries before the dawn of Islam. Saint Augustine said, “Let the Bible be a book for you so that you may hear it; let the sphere of the world be also a book for you so that you may see it.” (2) In this saying he suggests a paradigm that word of God or scripture should be in accord with the act of God, our world or what we broadly label as nature.
Saint Augustine became convinced of Christianity by finding evidence for it in another tradition, that of Paganism as described by the Platonists of Athens. Describing this, in his book Confessions, he provided a bridge from Paganism to Christianity.
Why does Augustine become convinced that Christianity is true? What does Augustine propose that Athens have to do with Jerusalem? What does Plato have to do with the Bible and more specifically with the Gospel of John? How can you examine the truth of one tradition of thought and reasoning in light of another parallel tradition? William R. Cook and Ronald B. Herzman answer these questions for us:
”Augustine tells us that he read books ‘written by the Platonists’ … he parapharases these books, rather than quoting them directly. His parapharase is also a parapharase of one of the most important texts of the Christian Scripture, the beginning of the gospel according to John. The surprising and, to some extent, shocking claim that he makes is that these Platonists teach the same thing as the Gospel of John. Augustine’s claim is that even though these words may not have been exactly what was said in the text of these philosophers, they accurately represent the substance of what he saw in them. Thus, in these pagan philosophical texts, he finds a way of articulating Christian beliefs.” (2)
Andrew Dickson White, the Founding President of the Cornell University, found in the 19th century that Augustine’s bridge was broken beyond repair. He authored a landmark treatise, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom (3).
Perhaps we needed a new bridge to lead us to the eternal truths. Dr. Maurice Buccaile came to our rescue almost a century later, but now he was serving Islam and his scripture of choice was the Quran. Bucaille (1920 – 1998) was a French medical doctor and author, he was the senior surgeon in a French study on mummy of Pharaoh, he converted to Islam from Christianity, while serving in Egypt. In 1973, Bucaille was appointed family physician to King Faisal of Saudi Arabia. His patients included the members of the family of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat.
He writes in the introduction to his book, The Bible, the Quran and Science, “Like Saint Augustine for the Bible, Islam has always assumed that the data contained in the Holy Scriptures were in agreement with scientific fact. A modern examination of the Islamic Revelation has not caused a change in this position. As we shall see later on, the Quran deals with many subjects of interest to science, far more in fact than the Bible. There is no comparison between the limited number of Biblical statements which lead to a confrontation with science, and the profusion of subjects mentioned in the Quran that are of a scientific nature. None of the latter can be contested from a scientific point of view. This is the basic fact that emerges from our study. We shall see at the end of this work that such is not the case for the Hadiths. These are collections of the Prophet’s sayings, set aside from the Quranic Revelation, certain of which are scientifically unacceptable.” (4)
His book, in my estimation, is one of the best apologies for the holy Quran, from the last century (5).
Fast forward a few decades, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, the previous international leader of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, wrote a comprehensive treatise on the theme of Religion and Science, with the title, Revelation, Rationality, Knowledge and Truth. The back cover the book introduces it as:
“Any divide between revelation and rationality, religion and logic has to be irrational. If religion and rationality cannot proceed hand in hand, there has to be something deeply wrong with either of the two. Does revelation play any vital role in human affairs? Is not rationality sufficient to guide man in all the problems which confront him? Numerous questions such as these are examined with minute attention.
All major issues which intrigue the modern mind are attempted to be incorporated in this fascinatingly comprehensive statute. Whatever the intellectual or educational background of the reader, this book is bound to offer him something of his interest. It examines a very diverse and wide range of subjects including the concept of revelation in different religions, history of philosophy, cosmology, extraterrestrial life, the future of life on earth, natural selection and its role in evolution. It also elaborately discusses the advent of the Messiah, or other universal reformers, awaited by different religions. Likewise, many other topical issues which have been agitating the human mind since time immemorial are also incorporated.
The main emphasis is on the ability of the Quran to correctly discuss all important events of the past, present and future from the beginning of the universe to its ultimate end. Aided by strong incontrovertible logic and scientific evidence, the Quran does not shy away from presenting itself to the merciless scrutiny of rationality. It will be hard to find a reader whose queries are not satisfactorily answered. We hope that most readers will testify that this will always stand out as a book among books—perhaps the greatest literary achievement of this century.” (6)
For the last few years, I have been the chair of the Religion and Science section for the Muslim Sunrise.
We have tried to continue the study of religion and science, in the footsteps of the best traditions before both in Islam and Christianity. The idea has been to know our world better, both in light of religion and science, and to engage with our fellow Americans, a large majority of whom are coming from the Christian background.
In the three great Monotheistic religions, Islam, Christianity and Judaism, God is viewed as a supreme, transcendent being, beyond time, space and matter, and yet the foundation of all that meets our senses that is described in terms of matter, space, and time. That is the Al Batin or the Hidden God of Monotheism. Furthermore, this God is not the god of deism, who created the world and then left it alone, or the god of pantheism, who is equated with all of existence. The Islamic and the Judeo-Christian God is a nanosecond-by-nanosecond participant in each event that takes place in every cubic nanometer of the universe. He has full knowledge of all things. God listens to every thought and participates in each action of His very special creation, a minute bit of organized matter called humanity that moves around on the surface of a tiny pebble in a vast universe. The Holy Quran declares: “Allah’s is the Kingdom of the heavens and the earth; and to Allah are all affairs returned for the final judgment.” (Al Quran 57:5)
Whereas, the nineteenth century physics was about to frame God out of physical understanding of the universe, the twentieth and twenty first century physics has turned the tables in favor of Monotheism.
Read about this theme further in the article, Religion and Science: The Indispensable God-Hypothesis, in the fall 2008 volume of the Muslim Sunrise (7).
The Muslim Sunrise has published several other articles to present the Creator God of Abrahamic faiths in general and Islam in particular in several other articles, in light of modern science and cosmology. For example, Al Wassay and the Expanding Universe: Scientific discoveries in support of faith (8), Quantum Theory – Sign of a Personal God (9), Al-Hakeem: The Wise, The Creator With A Purpose (10) and Allah the Protector of Life on Earth (11).
While there are several articles written from the theist perspective for the agnostic or atheist audience, we also aim to invite the Christian brethren and sisters to the Muslim theology, banking on the latest science.
Evidence for evolution has been piling in the last few decades especially in the field of molecular biology and has been a topic of several articles in the Muslim Sunrise. Not to speak of our human family, all life forms on our planet earth, plants and animals, 350,000 species of flowers, bacteria and viruses and elephants and rhinoceroses have common ancestry.
The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey is a 2002 book by Spencer Wells, an American geneticist and anthropologist, in which he uses techniques and theories of genetics and evolutionary biology to trace the geographical dispersal of early human migrations out of Africa. The book was made into a TV documentary in 2003.
An article in the winter 2016 volume, Biology of Our Human Family: Who are We Related To? examined the human origins: “It is believed, on the basis of genetic evidence that all human beings in existence now descend from one single man who lived in Africa about 60,000 years ago. The earliest groups of humans are believed to find their present-day descendants among the San people, a group that is now found in western southern Africa. The San are smaller than the Bantu. They have lighter skins, more tightly curled hair, and they share the epicanthal fold with the people of Central and South East Asia.” (12)
With the Biblical Adam being only 6000 years old, it can now be conclusively proved from molecular biology that he is not the father of all of humanity. In light of such evidence, I clearly demonstrated with scientific proofs in a 2008 article that Original Sin, a fundamental dogma of Christianity, does not hold water anymore.
It is not every day that one comes up with scientific reasoning against a religion followed by almost 2 billion people. In that sense, this 2008 article of the Muslim Sunrise, Evaluating Original Sin against scientific discoveries, has historic and landmark significance, in guiding the Abrahamic faiths to more pure Monotheism and enlightened theology (13).
The fall 2009 volume aimed at describing the limitations of Intelligent Design movement in USA and had an article titled: Intelligent Design Movement: A Branch of Philosophy (14).
The summer 2012 volume examined different religions in the light of science, The Root Cause of Conflict Between Religion and Science: Wrong Theology! (15)
We published an article in pursuit of truth in 2015, From the Muslim Sunrise: Truth and Science. (16) Later the same year we had a similar article with additional insights, Science in service of scriptures. (17)
Several additional subjects under the umbrella of Religion and Science have been covered in the Muslim Sunrise in the last 15 years or so. For example, Neurobiology of Dreams and Revelation (18) and Can Artificial Intelligence have Consciousness — A Quranic Perspective? (19)
In conclusion, the theme of Religion and Science has not only been important since the time of Saint Augustine, but is catching greater momentum in our information and scientific age. Therefore we will continue to pursue the subject with greater zeal and God willing, even greater success.
Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times
One quality is immediately obvious that they were both liberators of slaves and there are many other commonalities between them, but, today I want to stress their emphasis on human conscience for noble and compassionate living.
President Abraham Lincoln said:
When I do good, I feel good. When I do bad, I feel bad. That’s my religion.
The Holy Prophet Muhammad said:
Seek the guidance of thy soul! Seek the guidance of thy soul! Seek the guidance of thy soul! The virtuous deed is one whereby thy soul feels restful and thy heart contented, and sinful act is one which rankles in thy soul and which contracts thy heart even though the other people endorse it as lawful.
When I was training to be physician in Wilson Hospital in 1990, in Johnson City, NY, I had done a month of rotation with a Rheumatologist in our town, Dr. Thomas Oven, who is still practicing and happens to be a Catholic. In his office I read a framed prayer by Saint Francis of Issisi:
Lord, make me an instrument of Your peace;
Where there is hatred, let me sow love;
Where there is injury, pardon;
Where there is discord, harmony;
Where there is error, truth;
Where there is doubt, faith;
Where there is despair, hope;
Where there is darkness, light;
And where there is sadness, joy.
O Divine Master, Grant that I may not so much seek
To be consoled as to console;
To be understood as to understand;
To be loved as to love.
For it is in giving that we receive;
It is in pardoning that we are pardoned;
And it is in dying that we are born to eternal life.
I like what I read.
For the last twenty three years I have been practicing as a Sleep Disorder and Lungs specialist in a Catholic Hospital in Binghamton NY, Our Lady of Lourdes. Here I have found respect, honor, livelihood and recognition that has shaped my life. I like what I have experienced.
Joel Osteen has no less than a thousand, half hour wonderful presentations, about positive thinking, hope, optimism and success. Most of these are available in YouTube and a few will be linked in this post. Some of these are repetitions but almost every sermon has some new materials and metaphors. For additional details: Videos: Let Joel Osteen Breathe Hope, Optimism and Success in Your Life. I do not pay him a dime for I find numerous charities more deserving of my contributions. Nevertheless, I like what I hear in Sirius XM radio and YouTube.
Jalal ad-Din Muhammad Rumi, a Persian poet from the 13th century is the best selling poet in USA these days. He wrote 3,000 love songs to his mentor Shams of Tabriz, the prophet Muhammad, may peace be on him, and God. His monumental Mathnawi has been called the Quran in the Persian language. According to William C. Chittick, Professor of Asian and Asian American Studies at Stony Brook University, as he highlights love in both the Mathnawi and the Quran, “This is not because it bears any outward resemblance to the Divine Word, but rather because Rumi was able to capture in a non-technical, everyday language, understandable to any Persian speaker, what he himself calls, ‘the roots of the roots of the roots of the religion’ – which is an apt description of the Quran itself, the foundation of every thing Islamic.” A beautiful one line summary by Rumi of the love in the Quran, an epitome of love, compassion and justice.
Some of my favorite quotes from Rumi are:
“Words are a pretext. It is the inner bond that draws one person to another, not words.”
“Wherever you are, and whatever you do, be in love.”
“Reason is powerless in the expression of love.”
“You have to keep breaking your heart until it opens.”
“Be empty of worrying. Think of who created thought.”
“Love is the bridge between you and everything.”
The holy Quran has taught me: “He is Allah, the Creator, the Maker, the Fashioner. His are the most beautiful names. All that is in the heavens and the earth glorifies Him, and He is the Mighty, the Wise.” (Al Quran 59:24) The details of the Creator God, I have learnt more from the Christian and Jewish scientists, philosophers, writers and teachers than the Muslim ones. For example: A Slight Twist Makes David Attenborough a Great Teacher for God of the Abrahamic Faiths.
I am a Jew, a Catholic, a Christian and a Muslim; I am Zia H Shah. How can I be otherwise, for I have drank from every and all wells?
Exalted is He who has sent the Differentiator down to His servant so that it may be a warning to all people. It is He who has control over the heavens and earth and has no offspring––no one shares control with Him––and who created all things and made them to an exact measure, according to the laws of nature. (Al Quran 25:1-2)
The last word in these verses is تَقْدِيرً. In these verses the word is best translated as laws of nature. In this Surah, in the next few verses, the All Knowing uses His knowledge of secrets of the heavens and the earth as a slam dunk argument for the truth of the holy Quran.
Therefore, I believe that the laws of nature or science are very important criterion to understand and present the holy Quran and to that study I have devoted the last few decades of my life.
The same word تَقْدِيرً is used for fate or destiny. In the past decades and centuries there used to be a lot of discussion about human destiny in the Muslim circles and writings but the pendulum is swinging in favor of science and laws of nature as scientific revolution has gained momentum with every passing decade.
The word تَقْدِيرً is used with a similar emphasis in at least three other verses and traditionally has been translated as ‘decree’ and I am keeping that translation below.
So He completed them into seven heavens in two days, and He revealed to each heaven its function. And We adorned the lowest heaven with lamps for light and provided it with the means of protection. That is the decree of the Mighty, the All-Knowing. (Al Quran 41:12)
So, gathering confidence from the above verses and with a grateful heart, praising and glorifying the Most Merciful and the Most Gracious, I conclude this article, by linking a few related articles at the end here:
Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times
The flag of Saudi Arabia has the creed of Islam on the top, I bear witness that there is no deity but God, and I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of God, which is the central tenet of the religion of Islam and the sword, at least to me, represents the coercion and force in the matters of state.
On the surface, the question I pose in the title of this article is very simple, and it will seem that 21 years after September 11, 2001 every human on the planet earth or at least every Muslim will know the answer. But, not so fast. I asked in all my Whatsapp groups, either friends ignored the question or no body knew the answer. It only triggered some debates.
Many Muslim readers may not be at ease with the title of my article, let me put their minds at ease that I am a devout practicing Muslim. I think many of them would smile at me if I ask four additional questions:
Is Christianity a religion or a state?
Is Judaism a religion or a state?
Is Hinduism a religion or a state?
Is Buddhism a religion or a state?
The last verse a religion or a state?
Is Christianity a religion or a state? It is a religion but it becomes a state when you meet Ex President Trump or the High Priest of Russia or read the following:
Judaism is a religion but Zionism is a state. Israel is a state and the more closely it bonds with Judaism, the latter begin to change into a state, to keep my description short, lest I am accused of anti-Semitism.
Is Buddhism a religion or a state? It is a religion but it becomes a state when the genocide of Rohingya Muslims starts.
The second part of my title is ‘Most Muslims do not know.’ This should not be alarming to the Muslim reader as they may have deeply held ideas on the subject. I did not say you as a singular reader do not know. The Muslims as a group do not know and for that I have plenty of evidence. The diversity in the picture below from Pew Research Center is a self evident proof of their being a total lack of consensus:
Support for making sharia the official law of the land varies significantly across the six major regions included in the study. In countries across South Asia, Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East-North Africa region most favor making sharia their country’s official legal code. By contrast, only a minority of Muslims across Central Asia as well as Southern and Eastern Europe want sharia to be the official law of the land.
It was a great service that in 2012 Pew Research Center surveyed 38,000 Muslims in all these Muslim majority countries regarding Sharia and other issues.
In South Asia, high percentages in all the countries surveyed support making sharia the official law, including nearly universal support among Muslims in Afghanistan (99%). More than eight-in-ten Muslims in Pakistan (84%) and Bangladesh (82%) also hold this view. The percentage of Muslims who say they favor making Islamic law the official law in their country is nearly as high across the Southeast Asian countries surveyed (86% in Malaysia, 77% in Thailand and 72% in Indonesia).15
In sub-Saharan Africa, at least half of Muslims in most countries surveyed say they favor making sharia the official law of the land, including more than seven-in-ten in Niger (86%), Djibouti (82%), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (74%) and Nigeria (71%).
Support for sharia as the official law of the land also is widespread among Muslims in the Middle East-North Africa region – especially in Iraq (91%) and the Palestinian territories (89%). Only in Lebanon does opinion lean in the opposite direction: 29% of Lebanese Muslims favor making sharia the law of the land, while 66% oppose it.
Support for making sharia the official legal code of the country is relatively weak across Central Asia as well as Southern and Eastern Europe. Fewer than half of Muslims in all the countries surveyed in these regions favor making sharia their country’s official law. Support for sharia as the law of the land is greatest in Russia (42%); respondents in Russia were asked if sharia should be made the official law in the country’s ethnic-Muslim republics. Elsewhere in Central Asia and Southern and Eastern Europe, about one-in-three or fewer say sharia should be made the law of the land, including just 10% in Kazakhstan and 8% in Azerbaijan.
Again, level of religious commitment makes a big difference in attitudes about the implementation of sharia. Muslims who pray several times a day are more likely than those who pray less frequently to favor Islamic law as the official law of the land. The difference is particularly large in Russia (+37 percentage points), Lebanon (+28), the Palestinian territories (+27), Tunisia (+25) and Kyrgyzstan (+24).
Across the countries surveyed, support for making sharia the official law of the land generally varies little by age, gender or education. However, in the Middle East-North Africa region, Muslims ages 35 and older are more likely than those 18-34 to back sharia in Lebanon (+22 percentage points), Jordan (+12), Tunisia (+12) and the Palestinian territories (+10).
Should Sharia Apply to All Citizens?
Among Muslims who support making sharia the law of the land, most do not believe that it should be applied to non-Muslims. Only in five of 21 countries where this follow-up question was asked do at least half say all citizens should be subject to Islamic law.
The belief that sharia should extend to non-Muslims is most widespread in the Middle East and North Africa, where at least four-in-ten Muslims in all countries except Iraq (38%) and Morocco (29%) hold this opinion. Egyptian Muslims (74%) are the most likely to say it should apply to Muslims and non-Muslims alike, while 58% in Jordan hold this view.
By contrast, Muslims in Southern and Eastern Europe who favor making sharia the official law of the land are among the least likely to say it should apply to all citizens in their country. Across the nations surveyed in the region, fewer than a third take this view. This includes 22% of Russian Muslims (who were asked about the applying sharia in their country’s ethnic Muslim republics).
In other regions, opinion varies widely by country. For example, in Southeast Asia, half of Indonesian Muslims who favor sharia as the official law say it should apply to all citizens, compared with about a quarter (24%) of those in Thailand. (Thai Muslims were asked if sharia should be made the official law in the predominantly Muslim areas of the country.) Similarly, in Central Asia, a majority of Muslims in Kyrgyzstan (62%) who support making sharia the official law say it should apply to non-Muslims in their country, but far fewer in Kazakhstan (19%) agree. Meanwhile, in South Asia, Muslims who are in favor of making sharia the law of the land in Afghanistan are 27 percentage points more likely to say all citizens should be subject to Islamic law than are those in Pakistan (61% in Afghanistan vs. 34% in Pakistan).
Yes in the matters of state there is a coercion, when police car comes with the sirens and rotating lights, one got to stop, there is no freedom. But according to the Quran there is no coercion in the matters of religion. (Al Quran 2:256)
So, in the details when Islam is a religion there can be no coercion. However, when it becomes state, law will be applied forcibly if needed. But, then law will need to be applied with an even hand no one will be above the law or beneath it, regardless of race, color, nationality, social or religious status.
Let us now go back in time to seventh century Arabia, when the holy Quran or Sharia was being revealed.
The year is 8th year after migration to Medina, Muhammad, may peace be on him, was now in Mecca, performing his last Hajj, surrounded by an ocean of faithful, devoted hearts, all proclaiming the glory of Allah, celebrating His praise, affirming His Unity, supplicating Him for forgiveness, mercy, compassion, invoking His blessings upon Muhammad. Arrived at the Mount, the Holy Prophet stood on the back of Qaswa and made his address:
‘I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship save Allah, the One, without associate, and I bear witness that Muhammad is His Servant and His Messenger.
‘I do not think, O people, that we shall be gathered together here again. Your belongings, your honor, and your lives are sanctified and made inviolate like the sanctity of this day, this month and this city. You will soon appear before your Lord and He will call you to account for all your doings. Take heed that you do not go astray, after I am gone, and start slaying one another.
As soon as he concluded, the revelation came: ‘This day have I completed My commandments -for you, and have brought to its fullness the favor that I have bestowed upon you, and have chosen Islam as your religion.’ (Al Quran 5:3).
The religion was complete, the wisdom of the ages had been revealed, the Quran and the religion of Islam had been completed, it had presented all the central ideas that humanity would need. BIOS of the human computers if you will had been finalized.
Humanity was to continue, history was not stopped, the Prophet was still alive, he was also the head of the state.
Ever since Islam has continued to be both religion and state with varying and oscillating emphasis all the time. Today, you can witness how Iran is a complete theocracy and Saudi Arabia is in the process of transition if you have been following the Crown Prince.
The subject matter here is on the one hand childish, but on the other hand very complex as we live all our lives in constant gaslighting from all fronts on this subject. It has taken me decades to demystify the issue for myself. So, bear with me as I take you from example to example, from one period to the next.
Is Islam a religion or a state?
It is important to distinguish. As there is freedom in matters of religion but use of force or coercion in matters of state, so unless we define clear boundaries human affairs become chaotic.
It is easy to understand anything in others rather than ourselves, where even the most enlightened among us have blind spots or areas that we cannot see and confuse. So, I am going to weave my story with at least some poignant examples from Christianity.
This interesting drama series has almost 40 episodes, trust me you will not be bored and your investment of time will be well rewarded with expansion of your horizons, fast forward the brief parts of nudity.
If you do not find time take my words, the Catholic Church had been and continues to be both religion and state. Its statehood now has been castrated and limited to the Vatican city only. But, in the time of king Henry VIII it extended all over Europe and the Christendom, excluding of course the areas ruled by the Eastern Orthodox Church or the Ottoman Empire. King Henry VIII was only a king or in other words managed a state, until given the struggle of divorcing his first wife and the Catholic Church’s opposition, he created the Church of England and from then on he was both master of the state and master of the religion of his people. In this part of the European history lies a very clear example of what is religion and what is state and their constant interplay.
Is Islam a religion or a state?
Going back to examination of Islam and the Muslims, the case of Shiite Islam is short and very straight forward.
Let us examine the case of Ismaili community in Shiite Islam. According to their website:
The Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, generally known as the Ismailis, belong to the Shia branch of Islam. The Shia form one of the two major interpretations of Islam, the Sunni being the other. The Ismailis live in over 25 different countries, mainly in Central and South Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Europe, North America and Australia, and number approximately 12 to 15 million. The Ismailis are thus a transnational community who are responsible citizens of the countries where they live.
Throughout their 1,400 year history, the Ismailis have been led by a living, hereditary Imam. They trace the line of Imamat in hereditary succession from Ali, the cousin and son-in-law of Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him). The followers of Ali, or Shia, already in existence during the lifetime of the Prophet, maintained that while the revelation ceased at the Prophet’s death, the need for spiritual and moral guidance of the community continued.
They firmly believed that the legacy of Prophet Muhammad could only be entrusted to a member of his own family, in whom the Prophet had invested his authority through designation before his death. That person was Ali, Prophet Muhammad’s cousin, the husband of his daughter and only surviving child, Fatima. The institution of Imamat was to continue thereafter on a hereditary basis, succession being based on designation by the Imam of the Time.
I have downloaded and saved the constitution of the community. A cursory read will clearly show that according to them Islam is unequivocally, both a religion and a state. Let me quote a few paragraphs to illustrate:
(A) The Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims affirm the Shahadah ‘La- ilaha illallih, Muhammadur Rasulu-llah’. the Tawhid therein and that the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Salla-llahu alayhi wa-sallam) is the last and final Prophet of Allah. Islam, as revealed in the Holy Quran, is the final message of Allah to mankind, and is universal and eternal. The Holy Prophet (S.A.S.) through the divine revelation from Allah prescribed rules governing spiritual and temporal matters.
(B) In accordance with Shia doctrine, tradition, and interpretation of history, the Holy Prophet (S.A.S.) designated and appointed his cousin and son-in-law Hazrat Mawlana Ali Amiru-l-Mu’minin (Alayhi-s-salam), to be the first Imam to continue the Ta’wil and Ta’lim of Allah’s final message and to guide the murids, and proclaimed that the Imamat should continue by heredity through Hazrat Mawlana Ali (A.S.) and his daughter Hazrat Bibi Fatimat-az-Zahra, Khatun-i-Jannat Alayha-s-salam).
(C) Succession to Imamat is by way of Nass,it being the absolute prerogative of the Imam of the time to appoint his successor from amongst any of his male descendants whether they be sons or remoter issue.
(D) The authority of the Imam in the Ismaili Tariqah is testified by Bay’ah by the murid to the Imam which is the act of acceptance by the murid of the permanent spiritual bond between the Imam and the murid. This allegiance unites all Ismaili Muslims worldwide in their loyalty, devotion and obedience to the Imam within the Islamic concept of universal brotherhood. It is distinct from the allegiance of the individual murid to his land of abode,
(E) From the time of the Imamat of Hazrat Mawlana Ali (A.S.), the Imams of the Ismaili Muslims have ruled over territories and peoples in various areas of the world at different periods of history and, in accordance with the needs of the time, have given rules of conduct and constitutions in conformity with the Islamic concepts of unity, brotherhood, justice, tolerance and goodwill.
(F) Historically and in accordance with Ismaili tradition, the Imam of the time is concerned with spiritual advancement as well as improvement of the quality of life of his murids. The Imam’s Ta’lim lights the murids’ path to spiritual enlightenment and vision. In temporal matters, the Imam guides the murids, and motivates them to develop their potential.
(G) Mawlana Hazar Imam Shah Karim al Hussaini, His Highness Prince Aga Khan, in direct lineal descent from the Holy Prophet (S.A.S.) through Hazrat Mawlana Ali (A.S.) and Hazrat Bibi Fatima (A.S.), is the Forty-Ninth Imam of the Ismaili Muslims.
1.2 Mawlana Hazar Imam has the sole authority to:
(a) determine all questions that may arise as regards the meaning and interpretation of any religious or jamati tradition or custom of the Ismailis and amend or discontinue it at any time;
(b) confer a constitution on the Jamat and amend or discontinue any such constitution or any provision thereof;
(c) determine all questions that may arise as regards the meaning and interpretation of any such constitution and grant dispensation therefrom;
It is also apparent that Mawlana Hazar Imam Shah Karim al Hussaini, His Highness Prince Aga Khan has complete autocratic authority over religious, spiritual and state issues of the 15 million Ismaili Muslims. His state is not defined geographically, but exists in the hearts and minds of the 15 million spread in different countries of the world.
Is Islam a religion or a state?
Next, let us move to Shiite Muslims in Iran and quickly try to understand their leader. He does own a geographical state.
The Supreme Leader directly chooses the ministers of Defense, Interior, Intelligence and Foreign Affairs, as well as certain other ministers, such as the Education, Culture and Science Minister. Iran’s regional policy is directly controlled by the office of the Supreme Leader with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘ task limited to protocol and ceremonial occasions. All of Iran’s ambassadors to Arab countries, for example, are chosen by the Quds Force, which directly reports to the Supreme Leader.
The office was established by the Constitution of Iran in 1979, pursuant to the concept of the Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist. According to the Constitution, the powers of government in the Islamic Republic of Iran are vested in the legislature, the judiciary, and the executive powers, functioning under the supervision of the Supreme Leader. The style “Supreme Leader” (Persian: رهبر معظم, romanized: rahbar-e mo’azzam) is commonly used as a sign of respect – although the Constitution simply designates them as “Leader” (رهبر, rahbar).
The Supreme Leader ranks above the President of Iran and personally appoints the heads of the military, the government, and the judiciary. Originally the constitution required the Supreme Leader to be Marja’-e taqlid, the highest-ranking cleric in the religious laws of UsuliTwelverShia Islam. In 1989, however, the constitution was amended and simply asked for Islamic “scholarship”, thus the Supreme Leader could be a lower-ranking cleric.
In its history, the Islamic Republic of Iran only has had two Supreme Leaders: Ruhollah Khomeini, who held the position from 1979 until his death in 1989 and Ali Khamenei, who has held the position since Khomeini’s death.
The biography of the Supreme leader should convince everyone that Shiite Islam is both a religion and state. The Iranian leader is ultimate authority in both religious matters as well as secular.
Having reasonably concluded that different and all branches of Shiite Islam are both religion as well as state, let us move to Sunni Islam.
Is Sunni Islam a religion or a state?
With the benefit of fourteen centuries of history let us go back to early Islam. The first four Caliphs after the Prophet are called the Righteous Caliphs, by the Sunni Muslims, because they showed high level of integrity and honesty that was not so apparent in those who followed.
These four Caliphs were the head of the state. As regards the understanding of religion of Islam, it was more democratic and there were several teachers of the religion depending on their scholarship. The memory of what had been taught by the Prophet Muhammad, may peace be on him, was fresh in the minds of all his companions and no single one could monopolize the understanding or interpretation of the religion of Islam. Encyclopedia Britannica says about Hazrat Aisha (ra), wife of the Prophet:
Traditional sources describe ʿĀʾishah as learned in religion, issuing legal opinions and engaging in consultation with the older male Companions of the Prophet. About a sixth of the hadiths recorded by al-Bukhari in his famed work Al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaḥīḥ are cited on her authority. Modern Muslim feminists regard ʿĀʾishah as personifying an early Islamic idealization of women as the social and legal equal of men, valorized for their contributions in both the private and public spheres.
He was known by the kunyah Abu Hurayrah “Father of a Kitten”, in reference to his attachment to cats, and he was a member of Suffah. Later during caliphate era, Abu Hurairah served as Ulama teacher, governor, soldier, and Hadith auditor. Among his other epithets is ذو الوينسين or “Possessor of the Two Elbows”, as his own narrations claim Prophet Muhammad praised him for his sturdy elbows and righteous character.
Abu Hurairah acknowledged by Muslim scholars for his extraordinary photographic memory which allowed him to memorize massive numbers of over 5,000 hadiths which later produced more than 500,000 chain narrations, or Isnad which make Abu Hurairah an exemplar role model for Hadith studies scholars. It is said by Abu Hurairah himself the only one who surpassed him regarding hadith were Abd Allah ibn Amr ibn al-As, another companion who serve as writer assistant of Muhammad and author of “Al-Sahifah al-Sadiqah“, the first Hadith book in history.
We can have a quick snapshot of our focus in the Battle of the Camel or Jamel, is Islam a religion or a state? It is both, but at least the religious authority is not concentrated in one person, in early Islam.
Hazrat Ali (ra), later to be the fourth Caliph, the cousin and son-in-law of Muhammad, had acted as the mediator between the rebels and Hazrat Uthman (ra), the third Caliph. Though he condemned Uthman’s murder, Ali likely regarded the resistance movement as a front for the just demands of the poor and the disenfranchised. His son, Hasan, was injured by the enraged mobs while standing guard at Uthman’s residence at the request of Ali.
Shortly after Uthman’s assassination, the crowds in Medina turned to Ali for leadership and were turned down initially.Aslan attributes Ali’s initial refusal to the polarization of the Muslim community after Uthman’s murder. On the other hand, Durant suggests that, “[Ali] shrank from drama in which religion had been displaced by politics, and devotion by intrigue.” Nevertheless, in the absence of any serious opposition and urged particularly by the Iraqi dissidents and the Ansar, Ali eventually assumed the role of caliph and Muslims filled the Prophet’s Mosque in Medina and its courtyard to pledge their allegiance to him. According to Shaban, the atmosphere of tumult after Uthman’s murder might have compelled Ali into accepting the caliphate to prevent further chaos.
Among those who pledged their allegiance to Ali were likely Talha and Zubayr. While there is no record of any violence according to Madelung, they both later broke their oaths, claiming that they had pledged their allegiance to Ali under public pressure.Veccia Vaglieri considers this claim to be fabricated and other reports suggest that Talha and Zubayr jumped ship after they failed to secure for themselves the governorship of Basra and Kufa and when Ali began to reverse Uthman’s lavish entitlements for the ruling elite, including those of Talha and Zubayr. A number of reports indicate that Ali had barred his supporters from pressing anyone to give their pledge.
Under the pretext of pilgrimage, Talha and Zubayr left Medina for Mecca, where they found a powerful ally in Aisha, the leading Mother of the Faithful, whose enmity with Ali is well-documented. Upon learning of Ali’s caliphate, Aisha, who had earlier incited revolt against Uthman, now publicly accused Ali of sheltering Uthman’s assassins and roused Meccans to avenge the death of Uthman, their fallen Meccan brother. The three demanded Ali to be deposed and a council to appoint his successor, presumably either Talha or Zubayr. These three were joined by the associates of Uthman, including Marwan, and other disgruntled former officials. Mecca soon became a hotbed of rebellion against the caliph.
The Battle of the Camel, also known as the Battle of Jamel or the Battle of Basra, took place outside of Basra, Iraq, in 36 AH/656 CE. The battle was fought between the army of the fourth caliph, Ali, on one side, and the rebel army led by Aisha, Talha and Zubayr, on the other side. Ali was the cousin and son-in-law of the Islamic prophet, Muhammad, whereas Aisha was a widow of Muhammad, and Talha and Zubayr were both prominent companions of Muhammad.
Aisha’s party had revolted against Ali ostensibly to avenge the assassination of the third caliph, Uthman. Both the efforts of Ali to save Uthman and the leading roles of Aisha and Talha in inciting Muslims against Uthman are well-cited. Ali emerged victorious from this battle in which Talha and Zubayr were both killed and Aisha was captured.
When Muhammad died in 632, ʿĀʾishah was left a childless widow of about 18, although some sources suggest she was older. She remained politically inactive until the time of ʿUthmān (644–656; the third caliph, or leader of the Islamic community), during whose reign she played an important role in fomenting opposition that led to his murder in 656. She led an army against his successor, ʿAlī, when he refused to bring ʿUthmān’s murderers to justice, but she was defeated in the Battle of the Camel. The engagement derived its name from the fierce fighting that centred around the camel upon which ʿĀʾishah was mounted. Afterward she was allowed to return to Medina. She spent the rest of her days there in disbursing alms, transmitting Hadith (the sayings of the Prophet), and interpreting the Qurʾān.
At any rate it is apparently clear that Islam was both a religion and a state and has continued to be so. Its manifestations in Sunni Islam have been varied over time in different parts of the globe.
Is Sunni Islam a religion or state?
Please keep conceptualizing different snapshots as they come to your memory from my writing or otherwise, from different time frames and different parts of the globe, does Islam seem like a religion or a state?
During the time of the four leading Sunni Imams they were the religious leaders and the Caliphs were the leaders of the state.
If we study the four traditional Sunni Imams, Islam mostly appears as a religion as they have no insights into the matters of the state like Machiavelli will teach us a few centuries later.
Some followers call him al-Imām al-Aʿẓam (“The Greatest Imam”) and Sirāj al-aʾimma (“The Lamp of the Imams”) in Sunni Islam.
Born to a Muslim family in Kufa, Abu Hanifa is known to have travelled to the Hejazregion of Arabia in his youth, where he studied in Mecca and Medina. As his career as a theologian and jurist progressed, Abu Hanifa became known for favoring the use of reason in his legal rulings (faqīh dhū raʾy) and even in his theology. Abu Hanifa’s theological school is claimed to be what would later develop into the Maturidi school of Sunni theology.
Malik ibn Anas (Arabic: مَالِك بن أَنَس, 711–795 CE / 93–179 AH), whose full name is Mālik bin Anas bin Mālik bin Abī ʿĀmir bin ʿAmr bin Al-Ḥārith bin Ghaymān bin Khuthayn bin ʿAmr bin Al-Ḥārith al-Aṣbaḥī al-Madanī (مَالِك بِن أَنَس بِن مَالِك بن أَبِي عَامِر بِن عَمْرو بِن ٱلْحَارِث بِن غَيْمَان بِن خُثَين بِن عَمْرو بِن ٱلْحَارِث ٱلْأَصْبَحِي ٱلْحُمَيْرِي ٱلْمَدَنِي), reverently known as al-Imām Mālik (ٱلْإِمَام مَالِك) by Sunni Muslims, was an ArabMuslimjurist, theologian, and hadith traditionist. Born in the city of Medina, Malik rose to become the premier scholar of prophetic traditions in his day, which he sought to apply to “the whole legal life” in order to create a systematic method of Muslim jurisprudence which would only further expand with the passage of time. Referred to as the “Imam of Medina” by his contemporaries, Malik’s views in matters of jurisprudence were highly cherished both in his own life and afterwards, and he became the founder of one of the four schools of Sunni law, the Maliki, which became the normative rite for the Sunni practice of much of North Africa, Al-Andalus (until expulsion of Muslims), a vast portion of Egypt, and some parts of Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Iraq, and Khorasan, and the prominent Sufi orders, including the Shadiliyya and the Tijaniyyah.
Perhaps Malik’s most famous accomplishment in the annals of Islamic history is, however, his compilation of the Muwatta, one of the oldest and most revered Sunni hadith collections and one of “the earliest surviving Muslim law-book[s],” in which Malik attempted to “give a survey of law and justice; ritual and practice of religion according to the consensus of Islam in Medina, according to the sunna usual in Medina; and to create a theoretical standard for matters which were not settled from the point of view of consensus and sunna.”
Let us fast forward and this time the landscape is the land of Turkey, later to be the Ottoman Empire. An internationally very popular, Turkish drama series that is also on Netflix, will give you a fictionalized account of Ertugrul, the father of the founder of the Ottoman Empire. Nevertheless, I believe it should serve as a good account of the beneficence of Islamic religion as well as state, which my pen has failed to capture so far and only highlighted the bloodshed and discord as regards the statehood in Islam:
Let us look at how the matters of state and Islam play out in UK. An exclusive investigation by the Asian Network and Victoria Derbyshire Program has found online services charging divorced Muslim women thousands of pounds to take part in sham Islamic marriages. The controversial practice, known as halala, is believed by a small minority of Muslims to be the only way a divorced woman can get back with her husband after a triple talaq – an instant divorce where a man says ‘talaq’ three times to his wife. These marriages can leave women open to financial exploitation, blackmail and even sexual abuse:
The holy Quran states that there is no coercion in the matters of religion. But that is the ideal condition. That is never the case in reality as self serving politicians and religious leaders intermix matters of religion or conscience with the matters of state, where force and coercion is necessary to save the victims. Meet General Zia Ul Haq.
Please do not be deceived by his civilian dress, he often wore army uniform and did not mind using all forms of carrots and sticks as needed to get the job done, ends justified the means, as was suggested a few centuries ago by the writer of the notorious short book, The Prince, Nicholas Machiavelli.
He successfully overthrew the elected government and ruled the country for more than a decade. The United States, notably the ReaganAdministration, was an ardent supporter of Zia’s military regime and a close ally of Pakistan’s conservative-leaning ruling military establishment. The Reagan administration declared Zia’s regime as the “front line” ally of the United States in the fight against the threat of Communism.
He had a fertile mind and freely mixed Islam in new ways in the matters of state that the country had not seen in the preceding decades.
The “primary” policy or “centerpiece” of Zia’s government was “Sharization” or “Islamization”.
In 1977, prior to the coup, the drinking and selling of wine by Muslims, along with nightclubs, and horse racing was banned by Prime Minister Bhutto in an effort to stem the tide of street Islamization. Zia went much further, committing himself to enforce Nizam-e-Mustafa (“Rule of the prophet” or Islamic System, i.e. establishing an Islamic state and sharia law), a significant turn from Pakistan’s predominantly secular law, inherited from the British.
In his first televised speech to the country as head of state Zia declared:
Pakistan which was created in the name of Islam will continue to survive only if it sticks to Islam. That is why I consider the introduction of [an] Islamic system as an essential prerequisite for the country.
In the past he complained, “Many a ruler did what they pleased in the name of Islam.”
Zia established “Sharia Benches” in each High Court (later the Federal Sharia Court) to judge legal cases using the teachings of the Quran and the Sunna, and to bring Pakistan’s legal statutes into alignment with Islamic doctrine. Zia bolstered the influence of the ulama (Islamic clergy) and the Islamic parties. 10,000s of activists from the Jamaat-e-Islami party were appointed to government posts to ensure the continuation of his agenda after his passing. Conservative ulama (Islamic scholars) were added to the Council of Islamic Ideology.
Islamization was a sharp change from Bhutto’s original philosophical rationale captured in the slogan, “Food, clothing, and shelter”. In Zia’s view, socialist economics and a secular-socialist orientation served only to upset Pakistan’s natural order and weaken its moral fiber. General Zia defended his policies in an interview in 1979 given to British journalist Ian Stephens:
The basis of Pakistan was Islam. … Muslims of the subcontinent are a separate culture. It was on the Two-Nation Theory that this part was carved out of the Subcontinent as Pakistan…. Mr. Bhutto’s way of flourishing in this Society was by eroding its moral fiber. … by pitching students against teachers, children against their parents, landlord against tenants, workers against mill owners. [Pakistan has economic difficulties] because Pakistanis have been made to believe that one can earn without working. … We are going back to Islam not by choice but by the force of circumstances. It is not I or my government that is imposing Islam. It was what 99 percent of people wanted; the street violence against Bhutto reflected the people’s desire …
How much of Zia’s motivation came from piety and how much from political calculation is disputed. One author points out that Zia was conspicuously silent on the dispute between the heterodox Zikri and the ‘Ulama in Balochistan where he needed stability. Secular and leftist forces accused Zia of manipulating Islam for political ends. According to Nusrat Bhutto, former First Lady of Pakistan:
The … horrors of 1971 war … are (still) alive and vivid in the hearts and the minds of people of [Pakistan]…Therefore, General Zia insanely … used Islam … to ensure the survival of his own regime…. — Nusrat Bhutto, 
How much success Zia had using state-sponsored Islamization to strengthen national cohesion is also disputed. Religious riots broke out in 1983 and 1984. Sectarian divisions between Sunnis and Shia worsened over the issue of the 1979 Zakat ordinance, but differences in Fiqh jurisprudence also arose in marriage and divorce, inheritance and wills and imposition of hadd punishments.
In one of his first and most controversial measures to Islamize Pakistani society was the replacement of parts of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) with the 1979 “Hudood Ordinance.” (Hudood meaning limits or restrictions, as in limits of acceptable behavior in Islamic law.) The Ordinance added new criminal offences of adultery and fornication to Pakistani law, and new punishments of whipping, amputation, and stoning to death.
For theft or robbery, the PPC punishments of imprisonment or fine, or both, were replaced by amputation of the right hand of the offender for theft, and amputation of the right hand and left foot for robbery. For Zina (extramarital sex) the provisions relating to adultery were replaced by the Ordinance with punishments of flogged 100 lashes for those unmarried offenders, and stoning to death for married offenders.
All these punishments were dependent on proof required for hadd being met. In practice the Hudd requirement—four Muslim men of good repute testifying as witness to the crime—was seldom met. As of 2014, no offenders have been stoned or had limbs amputated by the Pakistani judicial system. To be found guilty of theft, zina, or drinking alcohol by less strict tazir standards—where the punishment was flogging and/or imprisonment—was common, and there have been many floggings.
More worrisome for human rights and women’s rights advocates, lawyers and politicians was the incarceration of thousands of rape victims on charges of zina. The onus of providing proof in a rape case rests with the woman herself. Uncorroborated testimony by women was inadmissible in hudood crimes. If the victim/accuser was unable to prove her allegation, bringing the case to court was considered equivalent to a confession of sexual intercourse outside of lawful marriage. Despite this the ordinance remained in force until the Women’s Protection Bill was passed in 2006.
Although the Sharia punishments were imposed, the due process, witnesses, law of evidence, and prosecution system remained Anglo-Saxon.
The hybridization of Pakistan penal code with Islamic laws was difficult because of the difference in the underlying logic of the two legal systems. PPC was kingly law, Haddood is a religious and community-based law.
He gave the country the notorious Blasphemy Laws that most have come to see as a curse now. To outlaw blasphemy, the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) were amended through ordinances in 1980, 1982 and 1986. The 1980 law prohibited derogatory remarks against Islamic personages, and carried a three-year prison sentence. In 1982 the small Ahmadiyya religious minority were prohibited from saying or implying they were Muslims. In 1986 declaring anything implying disrespect to the Islamic prophetMuhammad, Ahl al-Bayt (family members of Muhammad), Sahabah (companions of Muhammad) or Sha’ar-i-Islam (Islamic symbols) was made a cognisable offence, punishable with imprisonment or fine, or both.
There is one Sunni sect of Islam that in its leadership and matters of state, is somewhat more akin to Shiite Islam, especially Ismaili community.
The reader does not need to decide if the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community is Muslim or not to benefit from what follows and has important bearing on the subject at hand. Is Sunni or Ahmadiyya Islam a religion or a state?
I present an address delivered by Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, the worldwide head of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, on the occasion of the centenary of Darul Qadha, the House of Justice, at the International refresher course. Recorded on January 20, 2019.
I share the following long video to demonstrate clearly once for all for friends and foe, that the community’s understanding of Islam is both as the final Divine religion but also that it covers the matters of state.
Again the focus here is, ‘Is Islam a religion or state,’ nothing more and nothing less:
Statehood is a messy affair, if you have watched any number of historical movies, and Islam is a religion of peace and submission to the will of God.
It is important to distinguish between religion and state. As there is freedom in matters of religion and conscience, but use of force or coercion in matters of state, so unless we define clear boundaries human affairs become chaotic.
To me Islam is a religion for personal life but also gives ideals for the statehood and communal living. If in matters of state we take it as a source of inspiration and information, like any rational person or group borrows good ideas from any where, then it will leave the possibility of consensus among people coming from different faiths open. Not only other faiths, the Muslims themselves can seldom agree on any fixed interpretation of any of the teachings, so insistence on ‘my way or understanding,’ is the only Divine dictate, leads to an impasse and sometimes schisms and civil wars.
The Muslims do not have to constantly dream of toppling the governments and installing theocracies, when they are peacefully living with other religions and sects, as that is not only unwise, but unjust and unfair and completely against the very essence of Islam that is peace at all levels, personal, social and spiritual.
Please allow me to say that we should not insist on our Islamic or Quranic understanding of statehood, as they will differ between a Sunni Muslim, a Shiite Muslim, an Ismaili Muslim, a Muslim with agnostic tendencies, a Muslim who does not want to be affiliated with any sect or an Ahmadi Muslim that many in Pakistan will want to insist are non-Muslims. Such insistence on our individual understanding only gives rise to conflict and discord and usually does not serve any useful purpose.
We can draw our inspirations about justice and compassion in the matters of state from the Quran but need to act on them through the civic process in the countries or states that we live in, interacting with our brethren and sisters from other faiths.
Please give up your ambition to get your country or your community or sect to Sharia Law and read the following. Remember Iran is still a theocracy but Saudi Arabia is trying to get away from that and that I believe should be self evident, if you have been up to speed with the current affairs:
Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times
First of all, my apologies if the title of the article hurts your religious sentiments, that certainly is not my intention.
I could not give up the temptation to write this article in a few minutes after I discovered a poll of 38,000 Muslims, by Pew Research Center.
I pose the question of who is a Muslim only sarcastically. I personally believe that anyone who considers himself or herself, for any good or bad reason, a Muslim is a Muslim. After all he or she is not a Christian, a Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist, an agnostic or an atheist. So, he or she is what he or she professes to be. To me it is self evident.
This article is a simple refutation of those who are critical or picky on how they want to define a Muslim and this includes probably a majority of the Muslims of all sects, the state of Pakistan and some other Muslim majority countries also.
The verse of the Quran that most theologians go to, for defining a Muslim, is the following and I provide translation by M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, published by the Oxford University:
The Messenger believes in what has been sent down to him from his Lord, as do the faithful. They all believe in God, His angels, His scriptures, and His messengers. ‘We make no distinction between any of His messengers,’ they say, ‘We hear and obey. Grant us Your forgiveness, our Lord. To You we all return!’ (Al Quran 2:285)
Conventionally six articles of belief have been emphasized in the Muslim tradition based on the above verse:
Belief in the Oneness of God
Belief in the Angels
Belief in the Books of God
Belief in the Prophets or Messengers of God
Belief in the Day of Judgment
Belief in the Divine Decree
In orthodox understanding of all Muslim sects all these six beliefs are considered essential.
If we read the details of the poll below about Angels, Divine Decree or Fate and belief in the Day of Judgment, there is no room left for black and white dogmatic judgment and one has to logically conclude that whoever calls himself or herself a Muslim is a Muslim.
If different people are disbelieving in the three categories polled below then it will make a very large segment of the 1.8 billion Muslim population, who will fall out of the fold of Islam or the label of a Muslim.
The Quran makes multiple mentions of angels, both collectively and individually, as in the case of the angel Gabriel.18 In light of this, it is perhaps not surprising that in most countries surveyed, a majority of Muslims say they believe in angels; in some regions this belief is nearly universal.
Across Southeast Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East and North Africa, nine-in-ten or more Muslims affirm the existence of angels. In the Central Asian countries of Turkey (96%), Tajikistan (89%) and Azerbaijan (88%), overwhelming numbers also say they believe in angels. However, acceptance of angels is slightly less prevalent elsewhere in Central Asia, including in Kyrgyzstan (77%), Uzbekistan (74%) and Kazakhstan (66%).
Muslims in sub-Saharan Africa also vary in their attitudes toward angels, though more than half in all countries surveyed affirm this belief. In seven of the 16 countries in the region, eight-in-ten or more say angels exist, including as many as 97% in Tanzania. In the remaining nine countries surveyed in the region, belief in angels ranges from 72% in Mali to 52% in Djibouti.
Among those surveyed, Muslims in Southern and Eastern Europe are generally the least likely to believe in angels. Fewer than two-thirds of Muslims embrace this article of faith in Russia (63%), Kosovo (60%) and Bosnia-Herzegovina (50%), while Albania is the only country in the study where fewer than half of Muslims (42%) believe in angels.
In general, Muslims who are highly committed to their faith, as measured by frequency of prayer, are more likely to believe in angels. The gap on this question between those who are highly committed (they pray several times a day) and those who pray once a day or less is particularly large in Southern and Eastern Europe and in Central Asia. In Kosovo, for example, highly committed Muslims are 32 percentage points more likely to believe in angels; in Russia, the gap is 28 points. Among the Central Asian countries surveyed, the gap is 20 percentage points in Uzbekistan and 15 points each in Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan.
Predestination, or fate, is another traditional article of faith that is widely embraced by Muslims around the globe. In 19 of the 23 countries where the question was asked, at least seven-in-ten Muslims say they believe in fate. In the Middle East and North Africa, roughly nine-in-ten or more Muslims in Tunisia (98%), the Palestinian territories (94%), Egypt (93%), Iraq (93%), Jordan (91%), Morocco (91%) and Lebanon (89%) endorse the idea of fate.
Belief in fate is also widespread across Southeast Asia and South Asia, with the number of Muslims who affirm this article of faith ranging from 95% in Indonesia and Afghanistan to 74% in Bangladesh.
Acceptance of fate is nearly as high in Central Asia. With the exception of Muslims in Kazakhstan (59%), at least seven-in-ten in every country in the region embrace the concept of predestination, including as many as 93% in Azerbaijan and 92% in Turkey.
Overall, Muslims in Southern and Eastern Europe are less likely to embrace the notion of fate. Levels of belief range from 78% in Bosnia-Herzegovina to 44% in Albania.
Belief in fate varies by level of religious commitment. In seven of the 23 countries where the question was asked, those who are more religiously committed are more likely to believe in fate. The prime example is Kosovo, where 59% of those who pray several times a day believe in predestination, compared with 36% of those who pray less often.
The Quran states that God will judge each individual by his or her deeds and that heaven awaits those who have lived righteously and hell those who have not.19 Belief in the afterlife is widespread among Muslims – majorities in all but one of the countries surveyed say they believe in heaven and in hell.
In South Asia and Southeast Asia, belief in heaven is nearly universal. The conviction that paradise awaits the faithful is nearly as prevalent across the Middle East-North Africa region. In these three regions, belief in heaven ranges from 99% in Thailand and Tunisia to 88% in the Palestinian territories.
Similar levels of belief are found in sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia, with nine-in-ten or more Muslims in most countries reporting that heaven awaits those who have lived righteously. In sub-Saharan Africa, the only countries where slightly fewer subscribe to this view are Chad (87%), Guinea Bissau (87%), Tanzania (86%) and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (85%). In Central Asia, Kazakhstan is the outlier, with only 70% of Kazakh Muslims expressing belief in heaven.
Overall, the lowest levels of belief in heaven are found in Southern and Eastern Europe, although even in that region at least half of Muslims surveyed in each country subscribe to the idea of paradise in the afterlife.
As in the case of heaven, belief in hell is particularly pronounced among Muslims in Southeast Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East and North Africa. Across all three regions, more than eight-in-ten Muslims say they believe in hell, with as many as 99% in Thailand and Tunisia subscribing to this view.
Slightly smaller majorities in Central Asia – ranging from 88% in Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan to 66% in Kazakhstan – also say that hell awaits those who have not lived righteously. Overall, the concept of hell is less widely embraced in Southern and Eastern Europe, with as few as 46% of Muslims in Albania endorsing the concept – the only country surveyed where less than a majority of Muslims believe in hell.
While respondents in some countries are less likely to say they believe in hell than heaven, the difference is especially pronounced in sub-Saharan Africa. In four of the 16 countries surveyed in the region, the percentage that believes in hell is at least 20 points lower than the percentage that says heaven exists: Guinea Bissau (23-point difference), Liberia (23 points), Uganda (23 points) and Mozambique (22 points). In the other sub-Saharan countries surveyed, belief in hell and heaven differs by about 10 points or less.
Muslims who are more religiously committed tend to express higher belief in the existence of both heaven and hell. This is especially true in Southern and Eastern Europe. For example, in Russia, among those who pray several times a day, 79% believe in heaven and 78% in hell. By contrast, among Russian Muslims who pray less frequently, 49% believe in heaven and 46% in hell.
The diversity in all these beliefs should invite all the 1.8 billion Muslims to more progressive and flexible way of thinking.
I suggest that these six beliefs should not be taken as black and white bullet points, rather important themes to dwell on and understand as we go on our personal journeys to the Ultimate, to Whom we are ultimately accountable.
I conclude by adding a few other articles for a more compassionate and less divided Islam:
Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times
Today I am going to make this reading assignment very short, after all I am indebted to you for indulgence of reading this and for that I love you and pray for you.
I am simply going to quote the three short verses of the Quran about my claim today and then present two paragraphs about Y chromosome from Wikipedia. This will be followed by a few useful articles about the holy Quran and about Afterlife and how the Quran uses the first creation as a proof for the second creation, for what is to come, for the eternal bliss of the righteous and reformation of those who fall short.
53:47. Later, it is form Him to initiate the second creation.
وَأَنَّ عَلَيْهِ النَّشْأَةَ الْأُخْرَىٰ
The Y chromosome was identified as a sex-determining chromosome by Nettie Stevens at Bryn Mawr College in 1905 during a study of the mealwormTenebrio molitor. Edmund Beecher Wilson independently discovered the same mechanisms the same year, working with hemiptera. Stevens proposed that chromosomes always existed in pairs and that the smaller chromosome (now labelled “Y”) was the pair of the X chromosome discovered in 1890 by Hermann Henking. She realized that the previous idea of Clarence Erwin McClung, that the X chromosome determines sex, was wrong and that sex determination is, in fact, due to the presence or absence of the Y chromosome. In the early 1920s Theophilus Painter determined that X and Y chromosomes determined sex in humans (and other mammals).
The chromosome was given the name “Y” simply to follow on from Henking’s “X” alphabetically. The idea that the Y chromosome was named after its similarity in appearance to the letter “Y” is mistaken. All chromosomes normally appear as an amorphous blob under the microscope and only take on a well-defined shape during mitosis. This shape is vaguely X-shaped for all chromosomes. It is entirely coincidental that the Y chromosome, during mitosis, has two very short branches which can look merged under the microscope and appear as the descender of a Y-shape.
The university references a verse from the Quran, regarding it as one of the greatest expressions of justice in history. Source: Step Feed When it comes to the law, both legislation and implementation are deemed relative. But the same can’t be said for justice as by definition it is the offering of what is morally … Read more
Source: Islam – Its Meaning for Modern Man, by Sir Zafrullah Khan THE QURAN, AS ALREADY STATED, IS THE RECORD of the verbal revelation vouchsafed by God to Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, over a period of approximately twenty-two years (610⎯632). It is the very words that God put in the mouth of that Prophet (Deut. … Read more
Translator: M.A.S. Abdel Haleem Publisher: Oxford University Press; Click here to read the translation of the individual surahs. If subscription is not possible or choose not to buy from Amazon, find the link in this post. Buy the translation in Amazon Introduction THE QURʾAN is the supreme authority in Islam. It is the fundamental and paramount … Read more
Introduction The Surah very precisely and concisely highlights a very common theme in the Quran of a Creator God, Who has created humans and this universe for a purpose and will hold them accountable. The first few verses of this Surah highlight the creativity of God Almighty as a proof for the Afterlife or the … Read more