Presented by Zia H Shah MD

Executive Summary

The concept of Al-Ghayb (The Unseen)—introduced in the third verse of Surah Al-Baqarah as the primary requisite for Divine guidance—serves as the theological fulcrum upon which the entire Quranic epistemology balances. This report provides an exhaustive, multi-disciplinary analysis of this concept, tracing its hermeneutical evolution from the “enchanted” ontology of the 7th century to the “empirical” ontology of the 21st century. While the pre-modern mind populated the Unseen with ontological entities such as Jinn, Angels, and the souls of the departed, the contemporary mind, conditioned by the rigors of the scientific method, increasingly populates this realm with cosmological entities: Dark Matter, Dark Energy, the Multiverse, and higher-dimensional space.

Drawing extensively on the contemporary exegetical work of Dr. Zia H. Shah and his comprehensive treatise, “The Epistemic Horizon: A Comprehensive Philosophical, Scientific, and Theological Exegesis of Quran 2:1-7” (2025), this report argues that the intrusion of science into Quranic understanding is not merely an apologetic convenience but an epistemic inevitability. We examine how modern cosmology’s revelation—that 95% of the universe consists of invisible mass and energy—serves as a “physical parable” that validates the theological claim of the Unseen. Furthermore, we analyze the “Sealed Heart” (Quran 2:7) through the lens of cognitive closure and frequency dissonance, positioning the modern materialist not as a champion of reason, but as an observer trapped within a limited dimensionality.

I. Introduction: The Phenomenology of the Unseen and the Crisis of Perception

The opening passage of Surah Al-Baqarah presents a binary epistemology that defines the human condition. Verses 1 through 5 delineate the psychology of belief (Iman), while verses 6 and 7 describe the psychology of disbelief (Kufr). At the center of this dichotomy lies a single, operative variable: Al-Ghayb (The Unseen). The definition of this term is not static; it is a dynamic horizon that shifts in accordance with the cognitive tools available to the civilization reading the text.

1.1 The Quranic Definition of Reality

The Quran asserts that reality is bifurcated into two realms: Al-Alam al-Shahadah (The World of the Witnessed/Seen) and Al-Alam al-Ghayb (The World of the Unseen). This is not a Cartesian dualism of mind versus body, but a hierarchical ontology where the “Seen” is merely the crust of existence, a thin veneer of observable phenomena floating upon a vast ocean of unobservable realities.¹ The Muttaqin (the God-conscious) are defined principally by their acknowledgment of this submerged reality. They operate with the conviction that the data available to their senses represents a fraction of the total truth.²

In the 7th century, this worldview was intuitive. The desert Arab lived in a “porous” world where the barrier between the physical and the spiritual was thin. The night sky was a canopy of lights potentially inhabited by angels; the desolate ruins were the dwellings of Jinn; the wind could be a mercy or a punishment. The “Unseen” was terrifyingly close.³

1.2 The Modern Epistemic Crisis

The modern reader, however, inhabits a “buffered” self, to use Charles Taylor’s terminology. The rise of Metaphysical Naturalism and the success of the Scientific Method have created a “Crisis of Perception.” The modern axiom states: If it cannot be measured, it does not exist. This philosophy, often termed “Scientism,” asserts the causal closure of the physical universe.⁴

For the 21st-century intellect, the classical definitions of the Unseen—Angels, Jinn, the Tablet, the Pen—often fail to resonate as “objective realities.” They are frequently categorized as folklore, myth, or psychological projection. This creates a dissonance for the modern believer: How does one maintain Iman bi’l-Ghayb (Belief in the Unseen) in an age that demands empirical evidence for every claim?

1.3 The Inevitability of Science in Exegesis

This report posits that science “creeps” into modern understanding because the modern imagination is furnished by scientific imagery. When a 7th-century reader heard “Unseen,” he imagined the vast desert night or the decree of a King. When a 21st-century reader hears “Unseen,” they inevitably imagine microbial life, radio frequencies, sub-atomic particles, or the cosmic void.⁵

The work of Zia H. Shah and the TheQuran.Love project represents the crystallization of this shift. By mapping Al-Ghayb onto the concepts of Dark Matter and Dark Energy, Shah attempts to rescue the “Unseen” from the realm of fairy tales and re-establish it as an objective, physical necessity for the existence of the universe.⁶ This is not a surrender of theology to science, but a colonization of science by theology—using the discoveries of the telescope to validate the claims of the scripture.

---

II. The Classical Landscape: Ontology of the 7th Century

To grasp the magnitude of the modern hermeneutical shift, one must first anchor the definition of Al-Ghayb in the classical tradition. The classical exegetes (Mufassirun) approached verse 2:3 with a focus on legal, spiritual, and eschatological implications, largely devoid of materialist anxieties. Their concern was not “Does the Unseen exist?”—which was a given—but rather “How does one relate to it?”

2.1 Linguistic and Theological Definitions

The term Ghayb stems from the root gha-ya-ba, meaning to be absent, hidden, or concealed. It stands in direct opposition to Shahadah (presence/witnessing). In the context of Iman (faith), it implies placing trust in realities that are inaccessible to the immediate sensory apparatus.

The View of Ibn Kathir (d. 1373 CE): The Moral Imperative

Ibn Kathir, representing the Tafsir bi-al-Ma’thur (exegesis based on tradition), synthesizes the views of the Salaf (predecessors). He emphasizes that belief in the Unseen is the raison d’etre of the believer, the defining trait that separates the sincere from the hypocrite.⁷

• Scope of Ghayb: For Ibn Kathir, the Unseen is a specific list of theological truths derived from Revelation: Allah, the Angels, the Holy Books, the Messengers, the Last Day, Paradise, and Hellfire.⁸
• The Psychological State: He connects belief in the Unseen to Taqwa (fear/consciousness of God). The hypocrite may pray in public (the Seen), but the Believer prays in private because they perceive the Unseen Gaze of God. The “Unseen” here is a moral panopticon—the awareness that one is being watched by a Reality greater than society.²
• Interpretation of the “Sealed Heart”: Ibn Kathir views the “sealing” mentioned in verse 2:7 as a Divine punishment for persistent rebellion. It is a spiritual deadening, where the capacity to perceive truth is removed because the individual has repeatedly chosen falsehood.⁹

The View of Al-Tabari (d. 923 CE): Trust as Epistemology

Al-Tabari, writing much earlier, provides a comprehensive linguistic analysis. He cites that Ghayb refers to that which is hidden from the eyes but perceived by the heart through the mechanism of Wahi (Revelation).

• The Role of the Messenger: For Tabari, belief in the Unseen is essentially “Trust in the Messenger.” Since the Unseen cannot be verified, the believer accepts it based on the credibility of the Prophet. If one requires visual proof to believe (like the Israelites demanding to see God plainly), faith ceases to be “faith” and becomes mere observation.⁹
• The Hypocrites: Tabari highlights that the hypocrites mocked the “Unseen” because they were empiricists of the basest sort—they only believed in the material power structures of Medina. They could not conceive of a victory or defeat that was not material.⁸

The View of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (d. 1209 CE): The Rationalist Approach

Al-Razi, known for his philosophical commentary Mafatih al-Ghayb (Keys to the Unseen), engages with the intellect more rigorously than his predecessors. He categorizes the Unseen into two distinct domains:

1. Absolute Unseen (Ghayb Mutlaq): Knowledge possessed only by Allah, such as the exact timing of the Hour or the Essence of the Divine. No amount of human inquiry can pierce this veil.¹⁰
2. Relative Unseen (Ghayb Nisbi): Things hidden to some but known to others, or things currently hidden that will be revealed in the future.

• Teleological Cosmology: Al-Razi often marveled at the “order of the heavens,” but his contemplation was teleological—focusing on the purpose of the structure rather than its mechanical composition. He viewed the “seven heavens” as spheres of authority governed by angels. For Razi, the “Unseen” was a realm of spiritual intelligences governing the spheres, not a realm of invisible physical matter or energy fields.¹⁰

2.2 The Pre-Modern Consensus

The classical consensus can be summarized as follows:

• Nature: The Unseen is primarily spiritual and moral, not physical.
• Access: Access is granted solely through Revelation (Wahi), not observation or experimentation.
• Function: It serves as a test of humility. The intellect must submit to the limits of its perception.
• Entities: Jinn, Angels, Souls, Barzakh (the barrier between death and resurrection).

There was no “crisis” of the Unseen in the 7th century because the pre-modern world was “enchanted.” The desert Arab accepted the existence of Jinn or Angels as readily as they accepted the existence of a distant oasis they had not yet seen but had been told about by a trustworthy guide.

---

III. The Modern Turn: The Epistemic Horizon

The transition to the modern era, particularly the post-Enlightenment period, introduced a radical rupture in human consciousness. The rise of Empiricism, Positivism, and later Metaphysical Naturalism fundamentally altered the definition of “truth.”

3.1 The “Disenchantment” of the Universe

Sociologist Max Weber described modernity as the “disenchantment of the world.” The magical, mysterious, and inexplicable were illuminated by the floodlights of science.

• The Empty Sky: Telescopes probed the heavens and found no angels, only gas and rock. Microscopes probed life and found no “vital force,” only chemistry.
• The Hermeneutical Vacuum: This created a vacuum for the Muslim exegete. If the Quran speaks of the “Heavens” and “Unseen Forces,” and science has mapped the heavens and found only vacuum and matter, the modern believer experiences cognitive dissonance. Is the Quranic cosmology obsolete?

3.2 The Rise of Tafsir ‘Ilmi (Scientific Exegesis)

In response to this crisis, a new genre of exegesis emerged in the late 19th and 20th centuries: Tafsir ‘Ilmi. This movement sought to validate Quranic truth by correlating it with modern scientific discoveries. The underlying logic was: If the Quran mentions scientific facts that 7th-century humans could not know, then its source must be Divine.⁵

• Early Proponents: Scholars like Tantawi Jawhari (d. 1940) filled their commentaries with diagrams of plants and celestial bodies, arguing that the Quran anticipated modern science. This was a defensive move to show that Islam was compatible with modernity.¹²
• The Psychological Shift: This marked a profound departure from the classical view. Instead of accepting the Unseen on the authority of the Prophet (Tabari’s view), the modern Muslim sought to “materialize” the Unseen to make it palatable to the scientific mind.¹³

3.3 Zia H. Shah and the “Epistemic Horizon” (2025)

Dr. Zia H. Shah, a physician and chief editor of The Muslim Times, represents the apex of this modernist trajectory in the mid-2020s. His work, specifically the commentary “The Epistemic Horizon” (December 2025), reframes Surah Al-Baqarah 2:3 not just as a religious test, but as a statement on the absolute limits of human perception.⁶

The Two Epistemologies

Shah posits that humanity is currently divided into two primary epistemic camps, mirroring the Quranic division of Believers and Disbelievers ⁶:

1. Metaphysical Naturalists (The Atheist/Materialist): They assert the “causal closure” of the physical universe. For them, reality is limited to the “Epistemic Horizon” of the senses and scientific instruments. If it cannot be detected, it does not exist. They are imprisoned in the “Seen.”
2. Transcendentalists (The Believer): They acknowledge that the observable cosmos is a subset of a vaster, unobservable reality. They possess Iman bi’l-Ghayb. They accept that the “Epistemic Horizon” is a limit of the observer, not a limit of existence.

The “Sealed Heart” as Cognitive Closure

A key innovation in Shah’s exegesis is his reinterpretation of the “Sealed Heart” (Quran 2:7).

• Classical View: A spiritual punishment for sin.
• Shah’s View: A state of “Cognitive Closure.” The atheist/naturalist refuses to look beyond the material horizon. They have tuned their cognitive receivers exclusively to the “FM frequencies” of matter, rendering them deaf to the “AM signals” of divine revelation. This is not necessarily a lack of intelligence (many naturalists are brilliant), but a “category error”—looking for metaphysical truth with purely physical tools.⁶ The “seal” is the self-imposed limitation of the materialist worldview.

---

IV. Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The New Parables of Al-Ghayb

The most distinct feature of modern commentary, particularly in Shah’s work and the TheQuran.Love project, is the identification of cosmological phenomena—specifically Dark Matter and Dark Energy—as the physical correlates or “parables” for the theological Unseen. This section explores the scientific reality of these phenomena and how they are hermeneutically repurposed to defend the Quranic worldview.

4.1 The Scientific Reality: The 95% Invisible Universe

To understand the power of this analogy, one must grasp the scientific context provided in the commentary. Modern cosmology has radically humbled the human claim to knowledge by revealing that the vast majority of the universe is “Unseen” even to our most advanced instruments.

Component	Percentage of Universe	Description	Quranic Analogy (Modern)
Baryonic Matter	~4.9%	Everything visible: stars, planets, gas, human bodies, light-reflecting atoms.	Al-Alam al-Shahadah (The Seen World)
Dark Matter	~26.8%	Invisible mass that does not emit or reflect light. Detected only by gravity. Holds galaxies together.	Al-Qayyum (The Sustaining Force/Grip)
Dark Energy	~68.3%	Invisible energy driving the accelerated expansion of the universe.	Divine Expansion (“We are its Expander” 51:47)

Data synthesized from ⁶, and.¹⁴

4.2 The Theological Mapping

Shah and similar modern commentators utilize these entities to deconstruct the arrogance of materialist atheism and validate the concept of Al-Ghayb.

Argument A: The “95% Universe” Critique

Shah argues that if a scientist in the 21st century refuses to believe in anything “unseen,” they are scientifically illiterate. Modern physics demands belief in a universe where 95% of the content is invisible (Ghayb) to our direct senses.

• The Insight: The materialist who demands “Show me God” is akin to a physicist who demands “Show me Dark Matter.” We cannot see Dark Matter; we only see its effects (gravitational lensing, galaxy rotation speeds). Similarly, we cannot see God; we only see His effects (creation, consciousness, revelation).
• The Quote: “Just as the ‘unseen’ Dark Matter is required to hold the ‘seen’ galaxy together, the ‘Unseen’ God is required to sustain the existence of the cosmos”.⁶
• Implication: The “Unseen” is no longer a gap in knowledge; it is the foundation of the physical structure of reality.

Argument B: Al-Qayyum (The Sustainer) and the Galactic Halo

The Quranic attribute Al-Qayyum (The Self-Subsisting Sustainer of All) is often linked to the preservation of the heavens.

• Verse: “Indeed, Allah holds the heavens and the earth, lest they cease.” (Surah Fatir 35:41).
• Scientific Context: In the 1930s, Fritz Zwicky, and later Vera Rubin in the 1970s, discovered that galaxies are spinning so fast that they should fly apart. The visible matter (stars) does not have enough gravity to hold them together. There must be an invisible “halo” of matter holding the galaxy intact.
• Modern Exegesis: Commentators posit that Dark Matter serves as a physical manifestation of this Divine “holding.” It is the invisible scaffolding that prevents the “heavens” (galaxies) from disintegrating. This equates the “Hand of God” in classical theology with the “Dark Matter Halo” in modern cosmology. The “Unseen” is literally the glue of the “Seen”.¹⁵

Argument C: The Expanding Universe and Dark Energy

Surah Dhariyat (51:47) states: “And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.”

• Classical View: “Expander” (Musi’un) was interpreted metaphorically—referring to the vastness of provision or the greatness of God’s power.
• Modern View: This is interpreted as a literal reference to the metric expansion of space. In 1998, it was discovered that this expansion is accelerating due to Dark Energy.
• Theological Import: Dark Energy—an invisible, pervasive force pushing the universe apart—becomes a testament to the “Active Will” of God pushing the boundaries of creation. It refutes the Newtonian idea of a static, clockwork universe and supports the Quranic view of a dynamic, expanding creation.¹⁴

4.3 Dimensionality and the “Seven Heavens”

The classical concept of the “Seven Heavens” (Sab’a Samawat) was traditionally viewed as literal spherical shells surrounding the earth (Ptolemaic cosmology). Modern exegesis, referencing String Theory and M-Theory, reinterprets these as “Extra Dimensions.”

• Dimensional Flatness: Shah argues that atheism is a form of “dimensional flatness”—an insistence on a 3D reality when mathematics points to 10 or 11 dimensions.
• The Unseen as Perspective: Just as a 2D being cannot perceive a 3D object (seeing only a slice of it), human beings cannot perceive the higher dimensions of the “Seven Heavens.” Al-Ghayb is thus re-categorized from “Magic” to “Higher Dimensional Physics.” The “Angels” may be beings operating in these higher dimensions, interacting with our 3D world in ways that seem miraculous but are physically consistent within a higher-dimensional framework.⁶

---

V. Establishing Prayer: Tuning the Consciousness

Verse 2:3 links “Belief in the Unseen” immediately with “Establishing Prayer” (Yuqimoona as-Salah). Classical commentary views this primarily as a legal obligation and a sign of obedience.¹⁹ Modern commentary, however, reframes prayer as a “Technology of Consciousness” necessary for accessing the Unseen.

5.1 Prayer as Frequency Alignment

The “Epistemic Horizon” commentary introduces the metaphor of frequencies to explain the mechanics of guidance.

• The Metaphor: If the Unseen is a reality (like radio waves or dark matter), then the human heart is the receiver. The “unguided intellect” is tuned exclusively to the “FM frequencies” of matter (sensory data, ego, survival). The “guided intellect” tunes to the “AM signals” of the Unseen (revelation, moral intuition).⁶
• The Mechanism of Salah: Prayer is not merely a ritual; it is the deliberate act of re-calibrating the receiver. By disengaging from the material world five times a day, the believer prevents “Cognitive Closure.” “Establishing” prayer (Iqamah) means maintaining the structural integrity of this connection.⁶
• Defect in the Receiver: Shah argues that when an atheist reads the Quran and finds no guidance, it is not a defect in the Book (the transmitter), but a defect in the receiver’s frequency. They are trying to download spiritual data using a materialist bandwidth.⁶

5.2 The Hard Problem of Consciousness

Dr. Zia Shah, leveraging his medical background, utilizes the “Hard Problem of Consciousness” (the inability of neuroscience to explain subjective experience/qualia) as a proof of the Unseen.

• Materialist Failure: Physics can explain wavelengths of light, and biology can explain the firing of optic nerves, but they cannot explain the experience of “redness” or the feeling of love. This subjective “I” is scientifically inexplicable under Strict Physicalism.
• The Soul as Unseen Operator: The soul is presented as the “Unseen Operator” of the “Seen” hardware (the brain). “Belief in the Unseen” includes belief in one’s own consciousness as a non-material reality. The atheist is forced into the absurdity of denying their own subjective reality to maintain their materialist dogma.
• Sleep and Death: Shah draws parallels between sleep and the Unseen, citing Quran 39:42 (“Allah takes the souls at the time of their death, and those that do not die [He takes] during their sleep”). As a sleep specialist, he notes that sleep is a daily journey into the Ghayb—a state where the consciousness detaches from the sensory world.⁴

---

VI. Why Science Inevitably Creeps into Modern Understanding

The user’s query explicitly asks why this scientific intrusion is inevitable. Based on the research, this is not accidental but structural. The “creep” of science into exegesis is a necessary consequence of the modern epistemic environment.

6.1 The Colonization of the Imagination

We live in an era where the metaphors of truth are scientific. We cannot think of “light” without thinking of “photons.” We cannot think of “sky” without “atmosphere” and “vacuum.” We cannot think of “earth” without “tectonic plates.”

• Linguistic Necessity: If a modern translator wants to convey the concept of a “subtle, invisible, powerful reality” (Jinn/Angels) to a secular audience, the most potent available vocabulary is that of “Dark Matter” or “Energy Fields.” To refuse these metaphors is to speak a dead language.
• The “Black Swan” of Revelation: Shah argues that a single instance of “Veridical Revelation”—information in the Quran that could not have been known in the 7th century (e.g., the expanding universe)—functions as a “Black Swan” event. It falsifies the philosophy of Naturalism. Therefore, science is brought into exegesis not to submit to science, but to use science to defeat the philosophy of Scientism. If the Quran knew about the Big Bang before Hubble, then the Author of the Quran is not a 7th-century Arab.⁴

6.2 The Argument from Design (Fine-Tuning)

The discovery of the “Fine-Tuning” of the universe (e.g., the precise value of the Cosmological Constant Λ) has revived the argument for design in a robust way.

• The Integration: Commentators utilize these constants (e.g., 10^-122) to argue that the “Unseen” is not just a fairy tale, but a mathematical necessity for the universe to exist. The Quran is thus read as a “Theory of Everything” that anticipated these constants. The “Unseen” becomes the “Fine-Tuner”.²¹

6.3 The “God of the Gaps” vs. “God of the Data”

Critics often accuse this method of being a “God of the Gaps” argument (attributing to God what science hasn’t explained yet). However, Shah and modern proponents argue they are advocating for a “God of the Data.” They claim that the data itself (the expansion, the complexity, the fine-tuning) points to the Unseen. Science does not disprove the Unseen; it merely pushes the horizon of the Seen further back, revealing a vaster Unseen behind it.²³

---

VII. Critical Analysis: The Risks of Materializing the Unseen

While the scientific approach is compelling to the modern mind, it carries significant theological risks, which are highlighted by critics and academic scholars.

7.1 The “Undistributed Middle” Fallacy

Scholar Hamza Tzortzis warns against the logical fallacies often committed in Tafsir ‘Ilmi. The most common is the “Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle.”

• The Fallacy:
  1. The Quran mentions “Invisible supports” (pillars).
  2. Science discovers “Invisible supports” (Dark Matter/Gravity).
  3. Therefore, the Quran is speaking about Dark Matter.
• The Error: This logic is flawed because “Invisible supports” could refer to many things (laws of physics, angels, divine will). Equating the verse definitively with a specific scientific theory (which might change in 50 years) risks falsifying the Quran if that theory is later discarded.²⁴

7.2 The Risk of Obsolescence

Mustansir Mir and Fazlur Rahman critique the “piecemeal” approach of scientific exegesis. They argue that treating the Quran as a book of scientific facts reduces its majesty.

• The Shift: If Dark Matter is debunked (e.g., by Modified Newtonian Dynamics – MOND), does the Quranic verse become false?
• Theological Reductionism: By insisting that Al-Ghayb must have a physical correlate (like Dark Matter), modern exegesis may inadvertently validate Materialism—suggesting that for something to be “real,” it must be matter/energy. This contradicts the classical view that the Spiritual is more real than the Material, regardless of whether it has mass.²⁵

7.3 The Danger of “Bucailleism”

named after Maurice Bucaille (author of The Bible, The Quran and Science), this trend focuses on “Scientific Miracles” rather than moral guidance. Critics argue this turns the Quran into a science textbook, distracting from its primary purpose: Huda lil-Muttaqin (Guidance for the God-conscious). The “Epistemic Horizon” approach attempts to avoid this by focusing on philosophical convergence rather than just fact-matching, but the risk remains.²⁷

---

VIII. Conclusion: The Horizon Remains

The comparison between the 7th-century and 21st-century understanding of Al-Ghayb reveals a profound evolution in Islamic thought, driven by the changing nature of the “Epistemic Horizon.”

Summary of Evolution

Feature	Classical Commentary (Ibn Kathir, Tabari)	Modern Scientific Commentary (Zia H. Shah)
Primary Definition of Ghayb	Spiritual realities (Angels, Paradise, Hell).	Unobservable physical/metaphysical realities.
Primary Metaphor	The Hidden vs. The Manifest.	Dark Matter/Energy vs. Baryonic Matter.
Epistemology	Revelation (Wahi) is the only source.	Science validates Revelation; Reason + Wahi.
Role of Nature	A sign (Ayah) of God’s power.	A code to be deciphered; “God’s Work.”
View of Disbeliever	Hypocrite or rebellious.	Cognitive Closure; “Dimensional Flatness.”
Purpose of Verse 2:3	To establish Taqwa (God-fear).	To establish the limits of Empiricism.

Final Insight

The “creep” of science into the understanding of the Quran is inevitable because the definition of “knowledge” itself has shifted. The modern believer cannot “un-know” the vastness of the cosmos or the weirdness of quantum mechanics.

However, the core function of Verse 2:3 remains unchanged. Whether one imagines a Jinn guarding a ruin or a Dark Matter filament binding a galaxy, the command is the same: to acknowledge that perception is not the limit of reality. The “Epistemic Horizon” described by Shah serves as a modern update to the “Veil” (Hijab) of the Sufis. Both acknowledge that humanity stands on the shore of a vast ocean. The 7th-century believer looked out and saw the Majesty of God; the modern believer looks out and sees the Mystery of Dark Energy. In both cases, the Muttaqin is the one who admits that what lies beyond the horizon is infinitely greater than what lies within it.

The challenge for the modern reader is to use science as a ladder to reach the Ghayb, but not to mistake the ladder for the destination. Dark Matter may be a “parable” for the Unseen, but it is not the Unseen itself. The Ultimate Unseen remains, as Razi concluded, the Essence of the Divine, forever beyond the reach of both the telescope and the text.

If you would rather read in Microsoft Word file: