Presented by Zia H Shah MD

1. Introduction: The Enigma of the Old Master in the Axial Age

In the grand trajectory of human intellectual history, the period spanning the 8th to the 3rd century BCE—termed the “Axial Age” by philosopher Karl Jaspers—stands as a singularity of spiritual awakening. Across the disparate geographies of the ancient world, humanity simultaneously forged the ethical and metaphysical frameworks that would define civilizations for millennia. In Greece, Socrates and Plato interrogated the nature of virtue; in India, the Buddha and the Upanishadic sages mapped the contours of suffering and liberation; in the Levant, the Hebrew prophets called for justice under a sovereign God. And in the fractured, warring principalities of China, two figures emerged whose dialogue would shape the soul of East Asia: Confucius, the architect of social order, and Lao Tzu, the mysterious prophet of the natural way.¹

Lao Tzu (Laozi), a name that dissolves upon inspection into the honorific “Old Master,” occupies a unique and paradoxical space in this pantheon. He is at once the founder of a major world religion (Daoism), a deity in its liturgical pantheon (Taishang Laojun), a philosophical anarchist revered by counter-culture movements, and, in the 21st century, a strategic resource for the soft power and ecological policies of the People’s Republic of China. His attributed work, the Tao Te Ching (The Classic of the Way and Virtue), consists of a mere 5,000 Chinese characters, yet it has been translated more frequently than any book save the Bible. Its brevity belies a depth that has accommodated commentaries from Han dynasty legalists, Tang dynasty poets, American transcendentalists, and modern management consultants.

Today, the influence of the Old Master is undergoing a profound renaissance. As China ascends to the status of a global superpower, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) under President Xi Jinping has engaged in a deliberate rehabilitation of traditional culture. The Tao is no longer dismissed as “feudal superstition” as it was during the Cultural Revolution; rather, it is being repurposed to underwrite the state’s vision of an “Ecological Civilization” (Shengtai Wenming) and to project an image of “harmonious” power abroad. Simultaneously, a quiet revolution is brewing among China’s youth—the Tang Ping (“Lying Flat”) movement—which draws implicitly on Lao Tzu’s doctrine of Wu Wei (non-action) to resist the crushing pressures of hyper-capitalist modernity.²

This report seeks to provide an exhaustive, multi-dimensional examination of Lao Tzu. It begins by reconstructing his life and historical context through the lens of ancient historiography and modern archeology. It then pivots to a detailed sociological and political analysis of his influence on contemporary China, navigating the tensions between state-sanctioned Daoism and organic grassroots spirituality. Finally, it embarks on a rigorous theological inquiry inspired by the intersection of Islamic and Daoist thought. Utilizing the Quranic model of prophethood (Nubuwwah) and insights from Islamic scholars who have engaged with Eastern wisdom, we ask a daring speculative question: Could Lao Tzu have been one of the 124,000 “unnamed prophets” sent by Allah to guide the nations of antiquity? Through a detailed deconstruction of texts, including the famous apocryphal maxim “Watch your thoughts,” we illuminate the startling convergences between the Way of the Dragon and the Path of the Crescent.

2. The Historical and Mythological Reconstruction of Lao Tzu

To understand the weight of Lao Tzu’s influence, one must first navigate the labyrinth of his identity. Unlike the life of Confucius, which is documented with relative historical density, Lao Tzu exists in the misty borderlands between history and hagiography. He is less a flesh-and-blood individual and more a cultural phenomenon—a composite avatar of the wisdom of the Chinese South, representing the fluid, the mystical, and the private, in contrast to the Northern, rigid, and public ethos of Confucianism.

2.1 The Records of the Grand Historian: Sima Qian’s Composite Dossier

The primary, and indeed the only substantial, source for the biography of Lao Tzu is the Shiji (Records of the Grand Historian), completed by the court historian Sima Qian around 100 BCE.¹ Writing centuries after the sage’s purported existence, Sima Qian found himself confronted with conflicting oral traditions and genealogical claims. With the intellectual honesty characteristic of a great historian, he did not fabricate a seamless narrative but presented a “composite dossier” of possibilities, explicitly acknowledging the uncertainty of his sources.

The standard biography identifies Lao Tzu as Li Er (courtesy name Dan). He was a native of the village of Quren, in the Li district of the Hu commandery, in the State of Chu (corresponding to modern-day Luyi County in Henan Province).¹ This geographical placement is significant; Chu was considered a semi-barbarian southern state, culturally distinct from the central plains, known for its shamanistic traditions and ecstatic poetry. This southern origin aligns with the mystical, nature-oriented character of Daoist thought.

Sima Qian dates Li Er to the 6th century BCE, making him an older contemporary of Confucius. However, the historian immediately destabilizes this identification by mentioning two other candidates:

1. Lao Laizi: A recluse from the state of Chu, said to have lived during the same period as Confucius and authored a work in fifteen parts on the practices of the Dao.
2. Dan, the Grand Astrologer of Zhou: A historical figure who lived in the 4th century BCE, over a century after Confucius, who famously predicted the separation of the states of Qin and Zhou.¹

This ambiguity suggests that “Lao Tzu” may act as a pseudonym for a lineage of archivists and recluses who transmitted a coherent body of wisdom regarding the preservation of life in turbulent times.

2.2 The Keeper of the Archives: The Bureaucrat as Mystic

Crucial to the Lao Tzu legend is his profession. Sima Qian records that he served as the Shi (Keeper of the Archives) for the Royal Court of the Zhou Dynasty in Luoyang.¹ The significance of this role cannot be overstated. The Zhou archives were not merely a repository of bureaucratic memos; they held the empire’s divinatory records (the I Ching archives), the genealogical histories of the clans, the records of rites and music, and the astronomical observations of the dynasty.

As the Shi, Lao Tzu stood at the very center of China’s high culture. He would have been intimately familiar with the rise and fall of political houses, the cyclical nature of natural disasters, and the futility of human intervention in the grand sweep of history. It is a compelling psychological thesis that Daoism—a philosophy of radical skepticism toward government and ritual—was born not in the wilderness, but in the heart of the bureaucracy. It was the insight of a man who had read all the minutes of the meetings, saw all the treaties broken, and realized that the “strategies” of men were dust before the movement of the Tao.¹

2.3 The Encounter with Confucius: The Metaphor of the Dragon

The most culturally potent episode in the biography is the meeting between Lao Tzu and Confucius. This narrative serves as a dialectical device, contrasting the two pillars of Chinese thought: Ru (Confucianism) and Dao (Daoism).

The legend recounts that Confucius, distressed by the moral decay of the age (the “Spring and Autumn” period), traveled to Luoyang to consult the renowned archivist Lao Tzu regarding the performance of the ancient rites (Li). Confucius believed that a restoration of ritual propriety was the key to social harmony. Lao Tzu’s response was a devastating critique of this humanistic optimism:

“The men about whom you talk are dead, and their bones are mouldered to dust; only their words remain. When the hour of the great man has struck he rises to leadership; but before his time has come he is hampered in all that he attempts. I have heard that a good merchant, though he has rich treasures deeply stored, appears as if he were poor, and that the superior man whose virtue is complete, is yet to outward seeming stupid. Put away your arrogant airs and many desires, your insinuating habit and wild will. These are of no advantage to you. This is all I have to tell you.” ¹

This rebuke strikes at the core of the Confucian project: the belief that human effort (Wei) and the cultivation of visible virtue (Ren) can save the world. Lao Tzu argues for Wu Wei (non-action) and the “virtue that looks like stupidity”—an inner power (Te) that is hidden and unpretentious.

Confucius’s reaction is equally telling. He did not argue. Upon returning to his disciples, he reportedly said:

“I know how birds can fly, how fish can swim, and how animals can run. But the runner may be snared, the swimmer may be hooked, and the flyer may be shot by the arrow. But there is the dragon. I cannot tell how it mounts on the wind through the clouds and rises to heaven. Today I have seen Lao Tzu, and can only compare him to the dragon.” ¹

The dragon, in Chinese metaphysics, is the supreme symbol of the Yang energy when it transforms and moves freely. It represents a being that cannot be categorized, trapped, or defined by social norms. By comparing Lao Tzu to the dragon, Confucius acknowledged a realm of reality that his own philosophy of social order could not encompass—the realm of the Transcendent and the Formless.

2.4 The Departure at Hangu Pass: The Textualization of Wisdom

The final act of the biography explains the genesis of the Tao Te Ching and cements Lao Tzu’s status as the “Hidden Sage.” Disgusted by the continued moral rot of the Zhou court, Lao Tzu resolved to leave the civilized world. He rode a water buffalo—an animal symbolizing the wet, dark, yielding Yin energy that overcomes the hard earth—toward the Western wilderness.¹

He arrived at Hangu Pass, the strategic fortification that separated the Central Plains from the “barbarian” lands of the west (modern-day Shaanxi). The guardian of the pass, Yin Xi (who would later become a patron saint of Daoist initiates), recognized the aura of the sage. He blocked the way and said, “Since you are about to retire from the world, I insist that you write a book for me.”

Under this compulsion, Lao Tzu stayed (tradition says for one night) and penned 5,000 characters in two sections: one discussing the Tao (The Way) and the other discussing Te (Virtue/Power). Having discharged his debt, he departed west, and “no one knows where he went.”

This ending is crucial. It asserts that the Tao Te Ching was a reluctant text, written only under duress by a man who knew that “The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao” (Chapter 1). It also establishes the “Western” mystery—legends later arose that Lao Tzu traveled to India and became the teacher of the Buddha (or became the Buddha himself), a polemical theory used by Daoists in debates against Buddhists in later centuries.⁷

2.5 Archeology and Textual Criticism: The Guodian Challenge

Modern archeology has added a fascinating layer to this biography. In 1993, excavators in Guodian, Hubei province, discovered bamboo slips containing versions of the Tao Te Ching dating to c. 300 BCE. These texts differ significantly from the received version (the Wang Bi text). They are less polemical against Confucianism and more focused on self-cultivation.

This supports the “composite author” theory. It suggests that the sayings of the “Old Master” were likely oral traditions circulating in the south of China, which were gradually compiled, edited, and politicized during the Warring States period (475–221 BCE) to serve as a counter-argument to the dominant Confucian and Legalist schools.¹ The “Lao Tzu” we know is likely the crystallization of a centuries-long movement of recluses who sought survival and sanity in an age of total war.

3. The Tao in the Machine: Lao Tzu’s Influence on Contemporary China

While the historicity of Lao Tzu remains elusive, his influence on the current trajectory of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is tangible and profound. After decades of suppression under Mao Zedong, where Daoism was attacked as “feudal superstition,” the reform era has seen a massive rehabilitation of indigenous philosophy. Under Xi Jinping, this has evolved into a strategic appropriation of Daoist concepts to serve the needs of the 21st-century party-state.

3.1 Ecological Civilization (Shengtai Wenming): The Green Tao

The most significant political manifestation of Daoist thought in modern China is the doctrine of Ecological Civilization (Shengtai Wenming). Formally enshrined in the CCP Constitution in 2018, this policy aims to shift China from the reckless, pollution-heavy industrialism of the Deng era to a model of sustainable, high-quality development.⁹

President Xi Jinping has explicitly drawn on Lao Tzu to legitimize this shift. In key speeches, he has cited the Daoist axiom of the “Unity of Man and Nature” (Tian Ren He Yi) and quoted Chapter 25 of the Tao Te Ching:

“Man models himself on Earth, Earth on Heaven, Heaven on the Way, and the Way on that which is naturally so (Ziran).” ¹

This is not merely rhetorical window dressing. It represents a deliberate attempt to construct a “Marxism with Chinese Characteristics” that is rooted in indigenous ontology. By invoking Lao Tzu, the CCP frames environmental protection not as a capitulation to Western liberal norms or climate treaties, but as a return to the “root” of Chinese civilization.

Table 1: Daoist Principles in Modern Chinese State Policy

Daoist Concept	Translation	Modern Policy Application	Rationale
Tian Ren He Yi	Unity of Man and Nature	Ecological Civilization (Shengtai Wenming)	Frames sustainability as a cosmic imperative rather than an economic constraint. Used to justify the “Green waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets” doctrine.
Wu Wei	Non-Action / Effortless Action	Macro-Control / Supply-side Reform	Interpreted not as laziness, but as avoiding excessive, unnatural intervention in the market. Using “invisible hands” (regulatory levers) rather than “heavy hands” (direct command) where possible.
Ziran	Self-so / Naturalness	Rural Revitalization	Promoting “eco-tourism” and traditional agriculture that aligns with local conditions rather than imposing industrial monocultures.
Governance as Cooking Small Fish	(Chapter 60)	Stability Maintenance (Weiwen)	“Governing a great state is like cooking a small fish”—do not poke it too much or it will fall apart. Used to justify gradualism and stability over radical democratic shock therapy.1

3.2 The Tang Ping (“Lying Flat”) Movement: A Modern Wu Wei Counterculture

While the state utilizes Daoism for governance, the youth of China have embraced Lao Tzu for resistance. The Tang Ping (“Lying Flat”) movement, which erupted on social media in 2021, advocates for opting out of the relentless competition of modern Chinese society.²

Facing the “996” work culture (9 am to 9 pm, 6 days a week), skyrocketing housing prices, and the pressure to marry and reproduce, millions of young Chinese have adopted a philosophy that mirrors the ancient Daoist recluses.

• The Manifesto: The movement’s unofficial manifesto, written by Luo Huazhong, declared: “Lying down is my wise movement. Only by lying down can humans become the measure of all things.”
• Connection to Lao Tzu: This is a modern, digital articulation of Wu Wei. Just as Lao Tzu rejected the Confucian strive for rank and ritual, the Tang Ping youth reject the Confucian-Capitalist strive for career advancement and consumption. They advocate a “low-desire life,” minimizing consumption to maximize spiritual autonomy.¹²
• State Reaction: The CCP views this grassroots Daoism as a threat. State media has labeled Tang Ping as “shameful,” distinguishing it from the state-sanctioned version of “struggle” (fendou). This highlights a historic tension: Daoism serves the state when it pacifies the population, but threatens the state when it undermines economic productivity.¹³

3.3 The Tao of Business: The “RenDanHeYi” Model

In the corporate sphere, a “Chinese Management Style” has emerged that explicitly blends Western management science with Daoist philosophy. The most prominent example is Zhang Ruimin, the CEO of the appliance giant Haier.

Zhang Ruimin is a self-professed devotee of the Tao Te Ching. He famously implemented the RenDanHeYi model (a play on the Daoist Tian Ren He Yi), which means “Maker and User Combined into One.”

• De-Bureaucratization: Inspired by Lao Tzu’s Chapter 17 (“When the leader’s work is done, the people say, ‘We did it ourselves’”), Zhang eliminated the entire middle management layer of Haier—over 10,000 jobs—turning the company into a flat ecosystem of thousands of autonomous “micro-enterprises”.¹
• Fluidity: This structure allows the company to be “like water” (Chapter 8), adapting instantly to market changes without the rigidity of a central hierarchy. Alibaba’s Jack Ma has also frequently referenced the Tai Chi principle of “using softness to overcome hardness” in his strategy of overcoming incumbent competitors like eBay in China.¹⁴

3.4 Soft Power and the “Sinicization” Paradox (2024-2025)

China’s use of Lao Tzu extends to foreign policy, where Daoist concepts like “Harmony” are used to project a non-hegemonic image (Soft Power). However, internally, the religious institutions of Taoism face increasing control under the policy of “Sinicization of Religion” (Zongjiao Zhongguohua).

Updates from 2024 and 2025 indicate a tightening of this “Strict Governance.”

• Loyalty Pledges: The China Taoist Association has organized mandatory seminars where clergy must study “Xi Jinping Thought” and pledge loyalty to the CCP leadership alongside their study of the Tao.¹⁵
• The “Five Identities”: Clergy are required to cultivate the “Five Identities”: identification with the Motherland, the Chinese Nation, Chinese Culture, the CCP, and Socialism. This creates a paradox: the philosophy of Lao Tzu is celebrated as the soul of the nation, but the religion that worships him is subordinated to a political machinery he would likely have critiqued as artificial and rigid.¹⁶

4. The Architecture of Destiny: A Comparative Exegesis

Central to the user’s query is the analysis of the quote: “Watch your thoughts, they become your words… for it becomes your destiny.” This section deconstructs this maxim and bridges it to Islamic thought.

4.1 The Myth of the Old Master’s Pen: Textual Authenticity

Scholars confirm that this specific quote does not appear in the Tao Te Ching nor in the Zhuangzi.¹ It is an apocryphal aphorism, likely of late 19th or early 20th-century origin, often attributed to figures like Frank Outlaw, Ralph Waldo Emerson, or even Margaret Thatcher in the West.¹⁷

However, the attribution to Lao Tzu persists because the logic of the quote is quintessentially Daoist. It follows the cosmology of the Tao Te Ching, Chapter 64: “A tree that fills a man’s arms grows from a seedling… The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” Daoism teaches that the macroscopic (Destiny) is always the accumulation of the microscopic (Thoughts/Qi).

4.2 The Islamic Parallel: Imam Ali and the Science of the Soul

While the quote is misattributed to Lao Tzu, it has a startlingly exact and authoritative parallel in Islamic tradition. It is attributed to Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib (d. 661 CE), the cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet Muhammad, recorded in the Nahj al-Balagha (Peak of Eloquence) and other Shi’a and Sunni sources:

“Look out for your thoughts, for they will become your words. Look out for your words, for they will become your actions. Look out for your actions, for they will become your habits. Look out for your habits, for they will become your character. Look out for your character, for it will become your fate.”.¹

This convergence is not coincidental; it reflects a shared understanding of human psychology found in wisdom traditions.

• Daoist Mechanism: A restless mind disturbs the Qi, leading to chaotic speech and “artificial” (Wei) action. The Sage cultivates Wu Wei to ensure thoughts align with the Tao, resulting in a destiny that flows like water.
• Islamic Mechanism: This logic underpins the science of Tazkiyat al-Nafs (Purification of the Self). The Khatir (fleeting thought) enters the heart. If accepted, it becomes Shahwa (desire), then Azm (resolve), then Fi’l (action). Repeated action becomes Malakah (habit/disposition), which seals the Qalb (heart) and determines the Akhirah (eternal destiny).
• Scriptural Foundation: The Prophet Muhammad said: “Verily, actions are but by intentions (Innamal a’malu bin-niyyat)…” (Sahih Bukhari). This confirms that the visible reality (Action) is entirely dependent on the invisible seed (Intention/Thought).

5. The Quranic Model of Prophethood (Nubuwwah)

To speculate on whether Lao Tzu could be considered a prophet in Islam, we must first rigorously define the Quranic model of prophethood.

5.1 The Universalist Paradigm: “To Every Nation a Guide”

Islam posits a radically universalist theology of revelation. The Quran explicitly denies that guidance is the exclusive preserve of the Semitic peoples:

• “And We have certainly sent into every nation a messenger, [saying], ‘Worship Allah and avoid Taghut (idols).’” (Quran 16:36).¹⁹
• “And there is not a nation but a warner has passed among them.” (Quran 35:24).¹⁹
• “And We sent messengers about whom We have related to you before and messengers about whom We have not related to you.” (Quran 4:164).

A famous Hadith (narrated by Abu Dharr al-Ghifari) states that there were 124,000 prophets sent throughout history.²⁰ Since only 25 are named in the Quran, Islamic theology leaves a vast space for the “Unknown Prophets” (Anbiya Ghayr Madhkurin) who may have appeared in India, China, the Americas, and beyond.

5.2 The Criteria of Validity: Nabi vs. Rasul

Islamic theology distinguishes between two ranks:

1. Nabi (Prophet): A human chosen by Allah to receive revelation (Wahy) and guide people to the truth, usually confirming the law of a previous messenger.²¹
2. Rasul (Messenger): A higher rank sent with a new code of law (Sharia) and scripture to a people who have deviated. Every Rasul is a Nabi, but not every Nabi is a Rasul.²⁰

The essential attributes (Sifat) of a prophet include:

• Tawhid (Monotheism): The core message must be the Oneness of the Divine.
• Ismah (Infallibility/Integrity): Protection from major sins and dishonesty in delivering the message.²²
• Wahy (Revelation): Knowledge comes from a divine source, not merely intellectual speculation.
• Mu’jizah (Miracle): A sign that validates their authority.

6. Speculative Theology: Was Lao Tzu a Prophet of Islam?

This section synthesizes the historical, political, and textual evidence to address the user’s core theological question.

6.1 The Case for Affirmation: The Tao as Al-Haqq

Proponents of the view that Lao Tzu was a prophet (or a recipient of Divine Wisdom/Hikmah) include the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community ²³ and various Sufi scholars like Seyyed Hossein Nasr and Toshihiko Izutsu.²⁴

1. Theological Convergence (Tawhid vs. The One):

The Tao Te Ching begins by positing an Ultimate Reality that is “Nameless” and the “Mother of the Ten Thousand Things.” Chapter 42 states: “The Tao produced the One; The One produced the Two…” This “One” (Taiyi) is the source of all existence.

• Islamic Parallel: This mirrors the Quranic concept of Allah as Al-Haqq (The Truth/The Real) and Al-Awwal (The First). The Tao is described as creating without possessing, acting without expecting—attributes that parallel the Divine attribute of Rabb (Sustainer) who needs nothing from His creation.
• Izutsu’s Analysis: In Sufism and Taoism, Toshihiko Izutsu argues that the Daoist “Mystery of Mysteries” is phenomenologically identical to the Sufi concept of the “Absolute Essence” (Dhat) of God, which is beyond all names and attributes.²⁵

2. Ethical Convergence (Islam vs. Wu Wei):

Wu Wei is often mistranslated as “doing nothing.” A more accurate theological translation might be “Surrender.” It is the cessation of the ego’s resistance to the Great Order.

• Islamic Parallel: The word Islam itself means “Submission” or “Surrender” to the Will of Allah. The Daoist sage who “flows like water” and “does not contend” is essentially practicing Taslim (submission) and Tawakkul (trust). The Prophet Muhammad’s statement, “I have surrendered my face to Allah,” resonates with Lao Tzu’s instruction to “Empty the self” (Xu).

3. The “Open Letter” Insight:

The research material includes an “Open Letter to Chinese Friends” which argues that Islam is the “completion” of Chinese wisdom. It posits that the virtues of the Chinese sages—filial piety, justice, the Golden Rule—are “lost property of the believer.” From this perspective, Lao Tzu’s teachings are seen as remnants of an earlier, perhaps non-legislative (Nabi level) revelation that prepared the Chinese consciousness for the final monotheism.19

6.2 The Case for Rejection: The Problem of the Impersonal Absolute

Orthodox Sunni and Salafi scholars generally reject the prophethood of Lao Tzu on strictly theological grounds.²⁶

1. The Impersonal Force:

The Tao is described in the Tao Te Ching (Chapter 5) as “not benevolent” (Bu Ren), treating the myriad things “like straw dogs” (sacrificial objects). It is an amoral, blind, generative force.

• Islamic Critique: Allah is profoundly Personal. He hears (As-Sami), sees (Al-Basir), loves (Al-Wadud), and responds (Al-Mujib). A force cannot send messengers, judge on the Day of Resurrection, or forgive sins. To equate Allah with an impersonal energy is considered a form of Ta’til (negation of attributes) or Pantheism (Wahdat al-Wujud in its heretical interpretation).

2. Lack of Sharia and Eschatology:

Lao Tzu did not bring a code of law, a system of ritual prayer, or a clear doctrine of the Afterlife (Akhirah). His focus was cosmological and earthly (longevity, political harmony). A Rasul must bring clear warnings of Judgment and specific commands, which are absent in the Tao Te Ching.

3. Polytheistic Accretions:

While philosophical Daoism is abstract, religious Daoism involves the worship of a pantheon of deities (Jade Emperor, Three Pure Ones). From an orthodox Islamic perspective, this association with Shirk (polytheism) complicates any endorsement of the founder, even if the founder himself was monotheistic (a trajectory similar to Jesus and the Trinity in Islamic thought).

6.3 Speculative Conclusion

Based on the Quranic principle of universal guidance, it is theologically plausible (though not doctrinally distinct) to speculate that Lao Tzu—or the figure behind the text—was a Nabi (Prophet) or a Hakim (Sage) inspired by Allah to guide the Chinese people away from the rigid idolatry of forms and towards the formless “One.”

His message of humility, simplicity, and the rejection of worldly status aligns perfectly with the Zuhd (asceticism) of the Islamic prophets. However, because his message (like that of many pre-Quranic figures) lacks the clarity of the final revelation and has been interpreted pantheistically, he remains in the realm of the “Unknown Prophets”—respected for his wisdom, his text mined for ethical gems like “Watch your thoughts,” but not followed as a source of religious law.

7. Conclusion

Lao Tzu casts a long shadow. From the archives of the Zhou Dynasty to the high-tech boardrooms of Shenzhen, his philosophy of the “soft overcoming the hard” has proven resilient. In modern China, he is the silent architect of “Ecological Civilization” and the spiritual patron of the “Lying Flat” resistance.

When viewed through the lens of Islam, the “Old Master” appears not as a stranger, but as a distant relative. The “Watch your thoughts” aphorism, though historically displaced, serves as a perfect bridge, linking the Daoist cultivation of Te with the Islamic discipline of Niyyah. Both traditions agree that the macrocosm of destiny is forged in the microcosm of the heart.

Whether Prophet or Sage, Lao Tzu stands as a testament to the universality of the search for the Divine. In a world fractured by rigid ideologies, the dialogue between the Dragon and the Crescent suggests that the “Way” and the “Path” may ultimately lead to the same “One”—the Nameless, the Real, the Lord of the Worlds.

If you would rather read in Microsoft Word file: