Presented by Zia H Shah MD

Abstract

This article examines how scientific commentary on the Quran can serve as a neutral, unifying ground for Quranic understanding beyond sectarian confinesthequran.love. It begins by outlining the divergent approaches to Quranic exegesis (tafsīr) across Islamic sects – from Sunni reliance on Prophetic traditions to Shia emphasis on Imams, Ismāʿīlī allegorical readings, and modern reformist rationalism. Each tradition often operates in a “parochial box,” prioritizing its own authorities and interpretationsthequran.love. The Quran itself, however, hints at infinite depths of meaning: it declares that if the ocean were ink for God’s words, the sea would run dry before those words were exhausted (Q.18:109), and that even if all trees were pens and several oceans of ink added, “the words of Allah would not be exhausted” (Q.31:27)thequran.lovethequran.love. These verses underscore that no single sect or scholar can monopolize the Quran’s wisdom. The study then posits that modern science and empirical truth offer a common hermeneutical lens – grounded in the Islamic principle of the Unity of Truth – that transcends sectarian dividesthequran.lovethequran.love. By viewing the “Book of Nature” alongside the “Book of Revelation,” Muslims from all schools can find shared evidence of the Quran’s truths in the natural world. Historical and contemporary examples show that empirical findings can illuminate Quranic verses (in areas like cosmology, biology, geology) in ways acceptable to Sunnis, Shias, and others alike, guiding readers out of insular interpretations toward a more inclusive understanding of the Glorious Quranthequran.lovethequran.love. While scientific tafsīr must be applied with methodological care, it cultivates intellectual humility by reminding us of God’s infinite knowledgethequran.love and encourages a pluralism of insights rather than dogmatic uniformity. In a thematic epilogue, the article envisions a future where the pursuit of knowledge—both scientific and spiritual—becomes a collective endeavor, uniting Muslims beyond sectarian identities in shared awe of the Divine signs and freeing Quranic interpretation from any sectarian or scholarly monopolythequran.lovethequran.love.

Introduction: One Scripture, Divergent Readings

Fourteen centuries after its revelation, the Quran remains the single unaltered scripture for all Muslims – Sunni, Shia, and others – with no “Shia Quran” versus “Sunni Quran.” Authoritative scholars of every major sect affirm the same 114 chapters, preserved since the codification of Caliph ʿUthmānthequran.love. Yet beneath this textual unity lies a tapestry of divergent interpretations. Each Islamic sect and scholarly school has developed its own norms of tafsīr (exegesis), often emphasizing different sources of authority and methods of reasoning. Over time, these methodologies have crystallized into distinct paradigms, sometimes creating insular interpretive traditions where each group prioritizes its own commentary heritagethequran.love. Sunnis, for example, traditionally draw on the Prophet’s sayings and companions’ explanations; Twelver Shīʿa give primacy to the teachings of the Imams; Ismāʿīlīs favor esoteric readings; and modern reformist movements stress rational coherence with contemporary knowledge. These approaches, discussed below, can be seen as “sectarian silos” – each illuminating certain aspects of the Quran while neglecting or glossing over others, especially verses not central to their theological debates.

Compounding this divergence is the reality that classical commentators were limited by the knowledge of their era. Many Quranic references to the natural world (cosmology, geology, biology, etc.) were either interpreted allegorically, explained by the science of the time (e.g. Ptolemaic astronomy), or simply passed over in silence when unclearthequran.love. As a result, vast portions of the Quran – particularly the “cosmic verses” that describe phenomena of nature – remained under-explored or misunderstood, while attention focused on legal or doctrinal verses that fueled sectarian debatethequran.love. Each sect tended to stay within familiar theological confines, seldom venturing beyond what earlier authorities had said, and often talking past one another on contentious issues.

Yet the Quran’s capacity for meaning far exceeds any one era or interpretive school. The scripture itself uses rich metaphors to remind believers of the limitlessness of Divine wisdom. It proclaims: “Say, ‘If the ocean were ink for [writing] the words of my Lord, the ocean would be exhausted before the words of my Lord were exhausted, even if We brought the like of it as a supplement’” (Q.18:109)thequran.love. And in another verse: “If all the trees on earth were pens, and the sea [were ink], with seven more seas added, the words of Allah would not be exhausted. Indeed, Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise” (Q.31:27)thequran.love. These hyperbolic images of endless ink and pens drive home the point that no amount of writing or human knowledge could ever exhaust God’s words and knowledgethequran.love. In other words, the layers of insight in the Quran are infinite, defying any finite attempt to delimit them. This serves as a humbling reminder that no single tradition, no matter how venerable, can claim a monopoly on understanding the Quran. The invitation of the Quran is ever-open – it continuously calls all readers to reflect, discover and deepen their understanding, rather than to fossilize it. Acknowledging this inexhaustible divine knowledge is essential if Muslims are to move beyond narrow sectarian exegesis and approach the Quran as a universal guidance for all humanitythequran.love.

Sectarian Approaches to Quranic Commentary: Parallels and Parochialism

Muslims of different sects share a profound reverence for the Quran, but their methodologies in unpacking its meaning have developed along distinct lines. Understanding these differences is key to appreciating how a new approach might transcend them. Below is a brief overview of major tafsīr paradigms across the Islamic spectrum and their limitations:

• Sunni Tafsīr – Primacy of Text and Prophetic Tradition: Sunni exegesis has historically emphasized tafsīr bi’l-ma’thūr – interpretation based on transmitted reports. The Quran is explained foremost by the Quran itself (comparing verses with verses), then by authentic hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad), and by the recorded interpretations of the Prophet’s companions. Classic Sunni commentaries such as Ibn Kathīr or al-Ṭabarī meticulously cite chains of narration to validate explanations. Apparent (ẓāhir) meanings are generally preferred unless strong evidence compels a figurative reading. Sunni scholars also developed the science of asbāb al-nuzūl (occasions of revelation) to contextualize verses. This text-centric approach produced a rich, anchored tradition. However, it can become text-bound – often reluctant to venture beyond the interpretations sanctioned by early authoritiesthequran.love. When verses touch on natural phenomena or scientific ideas unknown to the early Muslims, classical Sunni tafsīr was typically constrained by the limits of 7th–10th century knowledge, or it lapsed into silence. Thus, hundreds of Quranic verses about the cosmos, biology, and Earth received relatively scant attention in Sunni literature compared to legal and theological versesthequran.love.
• Twelver Shīʿa Tafsīr – The Light of the Imams: Twelver Shia Muslims share many interpretive tools with Sunnis (linguistic analysis, context, hadith), but differ in authority hierarchy. Alongside the Prophet’s sayings, Shia exegesis gives great weight to the teachings of the Imams (Ali and his eleven successors, in Shia belief), regarded as infallible guides to the Quran. Shia commentators like ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabā’ī (author of Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān) often cite narrations from Imam Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq and others, which can unveil deeper (bāṭin) meanings beyond the literalthequran.love. There is a stronger openness to allegorical or esoteric interpretations if supported by the Imams’ insight – for example, seeing references to light and darkness, or sun and moon, as symbols for spiritual truths rather than just physical descriptions. This approach adds spiritual and metaphysical dimensions to tafsīr, but it, too, was limited by the worldview of its time. Pre-modern Shia scholars, lacking modern scientific knowledge, would explain verses on nature through inherited cosmologies or simply declare tawaqquf (suspension of judgement) on mysteries beyond their understandingthequran.love. They excelled in elaborating theological and moral lessons, but like their Sunni counterparts, under-explored Quranic insights into the natural world.
• Ismāʿīlī and Esoteric Tafsīr – Allegory Unbound: A subset of Shi’ism, the Ismāʿīlīs, developed perhaps the most metaphor-rich tafsīr tradition. Guided by a living Imam (the Aga Khan in modern times), Ismāʿīlī exegesis often reads Quranic verses on multiple levels. The outward text (ẓāhir) is seen as a veil over hidden (bāṭin) truths accessible only via the Imam’s authoritative interpretation. For instance, references to the “sun” and “moon” might be interpreted as symbols for the Prophet and the Imam, or for different levels of reality, rather than the celestial bodiesthequran.love. Such readings yield profound intra-sectarian meaning and philosophical depth. However, to outsiders they can seem highly subjective or detached from the Quran’s plain sense. The Ismāʿīlī approach thus exemplifies a parochial box par excellence: it forges unity of understanding within the Ismāʿīlī community, but its very esotericism makes it inaccessible and unconvincing to non-Ismāʿīlīsthequran.love. Moreover, by prioritizing spiritual allegory, it historically paid little attention to correlating verses with the empirically observable world.
• Ahmadiyya and Modernist Tafsīr – Reason and Re-Interpretation: The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community (a movement founded in 1889 by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) offers a distinctly modern, rationalist approach to Quran interpretation. Ahmadi exegesis strongly emphasizes consistency with reason, ethical coherence, and compatibility with established scientific facts. The Ahmadi commentators often reinterpreted miraculous or ambiguous verses in naturalistic ways to avoid conflict with science. For example, phenomena like the splitting of the moon or Jesus’s ascent to heaven are explained metaphorically or as events within the laws of nature, rather than as violations of physicsthequran.love. They famously stress that no Quranic verse can contradict proven scientific truth – a stance that essentially anticipated the broader 20th-century trend of tafsīr ʿilmī (scientific exegesis). In many ways, Ahmadi scholarship in the early 1900s pioneered the reconciliation of Quran and science, an outlook now increasingly adopted by Sunni and Shia modernists alikethequran.love. However, sectarian suspicions have limited its wider acceptance: because of theological disputes (e.g. over the finality of prophethood), other Muslims often rejected Ahmadi interpretations even when they were grounded in reason and evidencethequran.love. This illustrates how sectarian identity can still impede the acceptance of an idea purely due to its source, highlighting the challenge of breaking popular scholars’ monopolies on tafsīr.

Other interpretive voices exist (e.g. Qur’ānīyūn who reject hadith, or modern feminist tafsirs), but the pattern is clear: each school looks at the Quran through its own lens, shaped by particular theological prioritiesthequran.love. Sunni scholarship produced extensive commentaries on legal verses and historical narratives; Shia works elaborated verses seen as alluding to Imam ʿAlī or the Prophet’s family; Sufi-influenced tafsīrs found spiritual allegories everywhere; and so onthequran.love. In this milieu, verses about the natural order – the sun, moon, stars, mountains, biology, and cosmos – often received only cursory or generalized treatment. They were rarely battlegrounds of sectarian debate (unlike verses on law or leadership), but rather were simply neglected across the board, left awaiting deeper exploration by future generationsthequran.love.

The downside of these compartmentalized traditions is that each community can become insularly convinced that its inherited tafsīr represents the complete understanding of the Quranthequran.love. A Sunni Muslim might distrust even a scientific explanation of a verse if it comes from a Shia or Ahmadi source, and vice versa, regardless of the explanation’s merit. In extreme cases, sectarian partisanship leads to outright denial of beneficial knowledge solely because it originated from “the other side.” This intellectual siloing has been compared to partisan politics: each sect sticking to its party line and seldom “crossing the aisle” to learn from othersthequran.love. Yet the Quran itself warns against dividing into factions and urges Muslims to hold fast to the rope of God together (cf. Q.3:103)thequran.love. It calls the faithful to unity in truth, not fragmentation. Is there, then, a way of approaching Quranic interpretation that honors the scripture’s message beyond sectarian constraintsthequran.love? In the face of God’s infinite words and wisdom, how can we open up tafsīr so that the Quran is no longer captive to sectarian monopolies or the authority of a few popular scholars, but is appreciated as guidance for all?

We propose that the empirical study of nature – science – offers such a way forwardthequran.love. By turning to the shared “second Book” of God (the universe), Muslims can find common reference points that do not belong to any one sect’s domainthequran.love. The phenomena of the cosmos, life, and earth are accessible to all, irrespective of theology or sect. When observations of the natural world help explain a Quranic verse, the insight carries a different weight – it is rooted not in one school’s authority, but in the authority of reality itselfthequran.love. Of course, observations can be interpreted differently, but the scientific method provides a generally agreed-upon means of testing and verifying claims about the natural world. In what follows, we explore the theological basis for this approach and see how embracing God’s infinite knowledge alongside empirical knowledge can lead to a more unified and open Quranic commentary.

Unity of Truth: The Theological Basis for a Common Lens

Islamic theology has long affirmed a simple but profound principle: God is One, and truth is one. All genuine knowledge, whether it comes from Revelation or from Reason and observation, ultimately comes from the same Divine source. This doctrine of Waḥdat al-Ḥaqq (the “Unity of Truth”) implies an intrinsic harmony between the Quran (the Word of God) and the natural world (the Work of God)thequran.love. The reasoning is straightforward: the same God authored both the scripture and the cosmos; therefore, if we correctly understand a Quranic verse and accurately understand a fact of nature, the two cannot contradict each other. Allah is Al-Ḥaqq (The Truth), and does not speak with a forked tonguethequran.love. This concept has served as a safety net for inquiry throughout Islamic intellectual history. It emboldened scholars like Ibn Rushd (Averroes) to assert that if compelling evidence shows a literal reading of a verse conflicts with proven reality, then that verse must have a metaphorical or deeper meaning – since demonstrable truth from God’s creation cannot be falsethequran.love. In other words, empirical truth can guide Quranic interpretation, helping correct our understanding of Revelation rather than undermining itthequran.love. This approach turns apparent conflicts into opportunities for deeper insight: the Quran invites readers to probe its meanings in light of the world, confident that God’s word and work ultimately align.

Importantly, all Muslim sects accept this premise in theory. A Sunni and a Shia may dispute certain hadith or theological points, but both will agree that the creation is full of God’s signs (āyāt) and that truth in nature reflects the truth of the Creatorthequran.love. In fact, the Quran itself uses the term āyāt (“signs”) to describe both its verses and natural phenomena, putting scripture and nature in parallel as twin revelationsthequran.love. For example, the Quran states: “And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth and the diversity of your languages and your colors. Indeed, in that are signs for those of knowledge” (Q.30:22). Here, the wondrous facts of nature (cosmic creation, human diversity) are directly called signs of God, just like verses of the Quran. From such verses it becomes almost an article of faith in Islam that studying the natural world can reveal God’s intent and attributes, since the cosmos is imbued with divine messages just as the scripture is. As the classical scholars often put it, God has two books: the book of Revelation (Quran) and the book of Creation (nature)thequran.love. Truly understanding His will involves reading both in tandem.

What has been needed is a common methodology to systematically “read” the Book of Nature alongside the Quran. Here, science plays an invaluable role. The scientific method – based on observation, hypothesis, testing, and evidence – is not sectarian. It does not rely on one madhhab or Imam. A solar eclipse, a strand of DNA, or the water cycle will appear the same to a Sunni, a Shia, or anyone else. Thus, science provides a shared language of discovery. In practice, this means, for example, that a Shia astronomer and a Sunni astronomer will largely agree on the observable facts of an eclipse. When they then turn together to the Quranic verse, “And the sun and the moon [move] by precise calculation” (Q.55:5), they bring a common understanding of celestial mechanics to the tafsīrthequran.love. The verse no longer floats in a vacuum of conjecture; empirical knowledge gives it a concrete reference point. Both scientists, regardless of sect, can concur that this verse alludes to the ordained orbital motions in the heavens – a reading far more precise and awe-inspiring than what pre-modern commentators could offerthequran.love. In this way, incorporating scientific knowledge can actually enrich tafsīr, making it more accurate and universally acceptable, rather than forcing a single “sectarian” interpretation.

Moreover, the Quran repeatedly invites believers to reflect on the empirical world as a means to strengthen faith. It urges people to ponder the alternation of night and day, the growth of plants by rain, the stars in their courses – often ending such verses with phrases like “for those who reason” or “for a people who understand.” The act of tafakkur (deep reflection) on creation is elevated in the Quran to a form of worship, one that all believers are encouraged (indeed, commanded) to engage inthequran.love. Not a single Islamic school ever claimed that contemplating nature’s signs is the exclusive domain of any sect or clergy – it is a universal devotional act. Turning to science, then, is essentially turning to a systematic form of tafakkur. Rather than being a foreign intrusion, it is a fulfillment of the Quran’s own imperative that had been lying dormant during epochs when Muslims lacked scientific tools or horizonsthequran.love. Now that those tools are available, using them to clarify allusions in the Quran is not a betrayal of tradition but the very fruition of that tradition.

“No Escape from Science” in Reading the Quran

In the modern era, Muslim scholars and thinkers increasingly recognize that engaging with science is indispensable for Quranic commentary. Dr. Zia H. Shah aptly observes that if we disallow reason and scientific insight in matters of religion, “we have, as a matter of fact, disallowed reason and logic… and religion becomes no more than blind faith in a set of dogma.”thequran.love Of course, the Quran is not a science textbook – its primary aim is guidance in morals and faith – but remarkably, by some counts about 750 verses (one in every five) touch on natural phenomena or encourage reflection on the created worldthequran.love. These include descriptions of astronomy, geology, biology, embryology, meteorology, and more. To read such verses ignorantly, without reference to what they actually point to in nature, would be to leave a significant portion of the Quran unexplored or even misinterpreted. As one analysis insightfully notes, “there is no escape from reading the Quran in the light of science,” because the Quran’s argument for God’s majesty – and even for core doctrines like the Resurrection – often hinges on reflections about creationthequran.love. In other words, the Quran itself directs our attention to empirical phenomena to make its theological points. Ignoring the scientific reality of those phenomena can dull the force of the Quran’s message, whereas understanding them can sharpen and enhance our appreciation of the scripture.

Consider a powerful example: When the Quran challenges doubters of resurrection by saying, “Look at the bones, how We bring them together and clothe them with flesh” (Q.2:259), or when it points to the barren earth revived by rain as proof that God can revive the dead (Q.36:33), it is using observable phenomena as evidence of spiritual truththequran.love. The more we know about these phenomena – bone healing and regeneration, or plant life cycles and soil biology – the more cogent and concrete the Quran’s argument becomes. Modern anatomy and biology have revealed just how bones can indeed knit and heal, and how lifeless soil blooms with microorganisms and plants after rainfall. These discoveries don’t undermine the Quran’s message; they amplify it, showing layers of wisdom that 7th-century people might only grasp at a surface level. In short, modern knowledge can amplify the Quran’s messages rather than threaten them. This understanding is now increasingly shared among Muslim thinkers of various backgrounds: they see science and scripture as allies, not adversariesthequran.love in the quest for truth. Engaging scientific knowledge in tafsīr cultivates a spirit of exploration and wonder that is true to the Quran’s own ethos.

A striking illustration of how scientific commentary can bridge sectarian divides is the reception of Maurice Bucaille’s famous work “The Bible, The Qur’an and Science.” Bucaille, a French surgeon, examined the congruence of certain Quranic statements with modern science (while pointing out scientific inaccuracies in the Bible). Though Bucaille was neither a Sunni nor Shia scholar – indeed, an outsider to Muslim tradition – his book was warmly embraced by both Sunni and Shia audiences across the Muslim world in the late 20th centurythequran.love. It was translated into numerous languages and became a common reference for Muslim scholars and laypeople from Egypt and Pakistan to Iran and Turkeythequran.love. The fact that a French scientist’s commentary on Quranic verses attained such ubiquity is telling: it transcended local sectarian scholarship, offering a mode of discussion that any educated reader could follow regardless of sectthequran.love. What mattered in Bucaille’s work was the evidence and reasoning, not the commentator’s sectarian lineage or theological school. In effect, Bucaille and the wave of “Bucailleists” after him created a new kind of tafsīr consensus – one built on empirical facts and open to anyone who found those facts convincingthequran.love. This showed that when the focus shifts to objective knowledge, Muslims rally around the Quran itself rather than around sect-specific interpretations. It exemplifies how the Quran’s infinite wisdom can speak in universal terms that all can appreciate, thus loosening the grip of sectarian or scholarly monopolies on interpretation.

Epilogue: Infinite Horizons of Quranic Understanding

The Quran, as we have seen, is far from a static text with a single, sealed interpretation. It is more aptly described as a living dialogue between the finite reader and the Infinite Authorthequran.love. Every generation, armed with its own insights and experiences, can approach the Quran anew and uncover fresh meanings, all while remaining within the broad framework of Islam. This ever-unfolding nature of Quranic wisdom is precisely what the scripture’s metaphors of unending ink and pens convey – the revelations of God and the signs of His creation are inexhaustiblethequran.love. Recognizing this infinite horizon of meaning carries profound implications. It instills intellectual humility, for we realize that no scholar, no matter how erudite, can pronounce the final word on a verse when God’s knowledge has no limitthequran.love. It also encourages a healthy pluralism: different perspectives are not threats, but contributions to a fuller understanding of the truththequran.love. In the Quranic spirit of “Let man consider what he was created from” (86:5) and “Do they not then reflect on the Quran, or are there locks upon their hearts?” (47:24), believers are urged to continually ponder, question, and learn. This collective inquiry becomes an act of worship and a means of unity.

Indeed, we can envision a future in which the pursuit of knowledge – both scientific exploration and Quranic study – becomes a shared spiritual endeavor for the Muslim communitythequran.love. In this vision, Muslims of all sects jointly marvel at new scientific discoveries and immediately turn to the Quran to see how these discoveries deepen their understanding of God’s words. A discovery in astronomy or biology is celebrated not as a challenge to scripture, but as a further unveiling of the divine signs that the Quran has been inviting us to reflect upon all alongthequran.love. In mosques and universities alike, Quran study circles might include scientists and scholars together, each contributing from their field of expertise. Such collaboration would unite Muslims beyond sectarian labels, as all drink from the same fountain of divine insight with a shared awe. The Quran would thus be lifted out of any narrow sectarian clutches and placed back in the hands of the global Muslim ummah as a common heritage of guidance.

Crucially, this approach liberates the Quran from the monopoly of popular scholars or factions and returns the focus to Allah’s message itself. This is not to disrespect the great commentators of the past – it is to build on their contributions with due reverence, while also acknowledging, as one scholar notes, that to insist the Quran’s meaning is limited to classical commentaries or context is effectively “an insult to God’s omniscience.”thequran.love God’s knowledge encompasses all eras, all sciences, all truths; hence His book continuously yields wisdom in light of new contexts. When Muslims approach the Quran with the conviction that “God is Omniscient, and infinite knowledge may be reflected in each and every verse of the Glorious Quran,”thequran.love they become open to insights from all corners – be it linguistic analysis, spiritual contemplation, or scientific discovery – that might enhance their understanding. No single interpreter or institution can close the gate to new insights, because the gate was never theirs to close. The Quran addresses all of humankind and repeatedly calls upon each person to think and reflect, guaranteeing that its treasures will unveil themselves to any sincere, prepared mind across time.

In sum, embracing the Quran’s infinite wisdom through a scientific and open-minded lens does more than just resolve apparent conflicts or curiosities – it revitalizes the experience of the Quran. It transforms tafsīr from a static inheritance of each sect into a dynamic, unifying journey of discovery for all believers. Muslims can stand together under the vast sky, pondering the stars as Abraham once did, and feel collectively the truth of God’s promise in the Quran that “We shall show them Our signs in the horizons and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that this [Quran] is the Truth” (Q.41:53). Such a future, where the exploration of the cosmos and the contemplation of scripture go hand in hand, would fulfill the Quran’s vision of a community united in pursuit of knowledge and in awe of the Creator. In this unity, the Glorious Quran is finally free from sectarian confines – a living guidance for all who seek truth, ever revealing new pearls from its infinite ocean of wisdom. Each believer becomes, as it were, a pen writing with the ink of a limitless sea, contributing their notes to the never-ending commentary of God’s word. And as knowledge advances and hearts remain open, the Quran will continue to speak, ever fresh, its verses proving inexhaustible as the divine knowledge they spring fromthequran.love. Such is the majestic invitation of the Quran – an invitation to all and sundry to drink from its ocean, and a promise that its insights will never run dry.

If you would rather read in Microsoft Word file: